Answer: I would think yes.
Explanation:
The advice to Kumasi Brewery Company Limited and Miklin Hotel is that by the terms of the contract, the contract <u>is repudiated</u>.
<h3>What is contract repudiation?</h3>
Contract repudiation occurs when a party to a contract cannot perform or deliver based on the terms of the contract.
A party to the contract can repudiate or cancel the contract as a remedy for non-performance, rendering the contract null and void if a party decides to go ahead with the contract performance.
Thus, the advice to Kumasi Brewery Company Limited and Miklin Hotel is that by the terms of the contract, the contract <u>is repudiated</u>.
Learn more about contract repudiation at brainly.com/question/7053473
Answer:
d. Mediation serves as a viable and affordable alternative to court trials and often ends with the same result as would a trial
Explanation:
Mediation is a situation where two different warring party are called together by a third party who had the aim of trying to resolve their differences between them.
The venue of their meetings could be at the mediators house or neutral ground. The major aim of mediation is to avoid the escalation of the issues which could lead to court cases and litigation by both parties involved. <em>Generally, it is a cheaper option of resolving conflicts rather than going through the court processes.</em>
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Answer:
I would probably say state because the state holds the business license but I'm not 100% sure
