Clarification:
I found the description of the event to complete the exercise online.
Answer:
He doesn't really understand what's going on, but he wants to be a part of it.
Explanation:
To complete this exercise, you have to select the correct answer after you read the description of the even.
The<u> correct answer is "He doesn't really understand what's going on, but he wants to be a part of it"</u> because Charlie says that he doesn't understand what the doctors are saying: <em>"I didn't get all the words but it sounded like..."</em> and then he gets excited when the doctor says they would use him: <em>"When he said that I got so exited I jumped up and shook his hand...".</em>
Answer:
He would one day be the one who would blind Polyphemus
Explanation:
Grammar
Answer:
In Olen Steinhauer's bestseller The Tourist, reluctant CIA agent Milo Weaver uncovered a conspiracy linking the Chinese government to the highest reaches of the American intelligence community, including his own Department of Tourism - the most clandestine department in the Company. The shocking blowback arrived in the Hammett Award-winning The Nearest Exit when the Department of Tourism was almost completely wiped out as the result of an even more insidious plot.
Following on the heels of these two spectacular novels comes An American Spy, Olen Steinhauer's most stunning thriller yet. With only a handful of "tourists" - CIA-trained assassins - left, Weaver would like to move on and use this as an opportunity to regain a normal life, a life focused on his family. His former boss in the CIA, Alan Drummond, can't let it go. When Alan uses one of Milo's compromised aliases to travel to London and then disappears, calling all kinds of attention to his actions, Milo can't help but go in search of him.
Worse still, it's beginning to look as if Tourism's enemies are gearing up for a final, fatal blow.
With An American Spy, Olen Steinhauer, by far the best espionage writer in a generation, delivers a searing international thriller that will settle once and for all who is pulling the strings and who is being played.
I believe the correct answer is "the writer should use facts that can be verified to address and disprove opposing viewpoints". By doing this the writer can prove that his information is correct and win the argument.
Hope this helps!
