1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ollegr [7]
3 years ago
14

In the Great Comprimise what did large states and small states give up? please help

History
1 answer:
Mrac [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The small states gave up their want for each state to have an equal amount of representatives regardless of their population, and the large states gave up their want for each state to have representation based solely on their population, but technically the Great Compromise worked it out.

Explanation:

Hope This Helps!

You might be interested in
How did the Assyrian Empire fall?
Bingel [31]
The rise of perisan.
5 0
3 years ago
What do demographers study?
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

<h2>B. How groups of people are all totally different</h2>

Explanation:

<h2>Hopes this helps. Mark as brainlest plz!</h2>
8 0
3 years ago
What was the most important outcome of Champlains exploration of North America ?
iren [92.7K]
Samuel de Champlain

Known as the Father of Canada or the Father of New France, Samuel de Champlain was a major contributor to the development of a French presence in North America. He was born in the village of Brouage on the Bay of Biscay and received his maritime education from his father, a ship’s captain. Little else is known about his early years.

Champlain served briefly in the French army before joining his uncle on a series of trading voyages to Panama, Mexico and the West Indies. His written account of his adventures included early speculation about the feasibility of constructing a canal through Central America. King Henry IV was impressed by young Champlain and provided him with a small pension.

In 1603, Champlain accompanied Francis Gravé, Sieur du Pont on a voyage to the Rivière de Canada (St. Lawrence River). The purpose of this venture was to develop the fur trade, but Champlain spent much of his time exploring his surroundings. He pushed up the St. Lawrence as far as the rapids near what would become Montréal, an area visited nearly 70 years earlier by Jacques Cartier. Champlain viewed Niagara Fallsand held to the belief that westward exploration would yield an opening to Asia.

A second voyage began in 1604 and resulted in a small settlement on an island in the St. Croix River (at the present-day boundary between New Brunswick and Maine). Champlain and his party spent a miserable winter there before relocating to Port Royal in the spring. Nearly two years were spent in exploring coastal lands to the south; it appears that Champlain probably ventured as far as Cape Cod. Lack of support from home led to widespread discouragement among the settlers; many accompanied Champlain back to France.

In 1608, Champlain returned to North America with the Sieur de Monts, but on this voyage they hoped to find more hospitable conditions than those encountered on Acadia. A small settlement was established at what would become Québec. The anticipated fur trade with the local natives was slow to develop and the first winter was harsh beyond all expectations; only eight of 24 settlers survived. Champlain eventually managed to forge tight bonds with the neighboring Algonquin and Huron. In 1609, he participated with them in a raid against their traditional enemy, the Iroquois. Using firearms, a frightening novelty to the Iroquois, Champlain succeeded in killing two opposing chiefs and making lasting allies of the Algonquin and Huron. On this foray, Champlain may have been the first European to see Lake Champlain, which he named for himself. He then returned to France for supplies and reinforcements.

Champlain returned to New France briefly in 1610. He was wounded while fighting the Iroquois and went back to France for treatment. In later years, he traveled across the Atlantic on a number of occasions in his efforts to keep the struggling colony alive. Pressing European affairs often diverted the attention of French officials and Champlain was forced to make his case for the colony repeatedly.

Warfare erupted between England and France in 1626. North America became one of the theaters of operations and was characterized by successful English forays against a number of settlements in New France. By 1628, the English had succeeded in cutting off Québec from outside contact. Champlain and the beleaguered settlers held out for a year, but were forced to surrender when provisions ran out. Champlain was taken into custody and briefly detained in England. Peace was achieved in 1632 and Québec was returned to French hands. Champlain returned to New France the following year, was warmly greeted and spent his remaining days strengthening the colony.

More than any other factor, Champlain’s determination was responsible for the success of New France. He initiated a solid relationship with native tribes, particularly the Huron, and was a witness to the growing rivalry in North America between France and England.

Francis Parkman : France and England in North America :Pioneers of France in the New World, The Jesuits in North America in the Seventeenth Century, La Salle and the Discovery of the Great West, The Old Regime in Canada by Francis Parkman.
This is the first of two volumes presenting all seven parts of Francis Parkman's monumental narrative history of the struggle for control of the Ameri...
The Dominion of War: Empire and Liberty in North America, 1500-2000 by Fred Anderson.
Americans often think of their nation’s history as a movement toward ever-greater democracy, equality, and freedom. Wars in this story are understood ...
Champlain's Dream by David Hackett Fischer.
In this sweeping, enthralling biography, acclaimed historian David Hackett Fischer brings to life the remarkable Samuel de Champlain
7 0
4 years ago
How many members does the House of<br> Representatives have?<br> A. 100<br> B. 435<br> C. 535
Crank

Answer:

The answer is 435

Explanation:

Because the House wanted a manageable number of members, Congress twice set the size of the House at 435 voting members. It permanently set the maximum number of representatives at 435. Hope this helped :)

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZ HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST 49+25 POINTS!!!
tigry1 [53]

trade came to a halt

workers were in great shortage

and possibly demanding higher wages. Depends on the overall economy of the certain area of the pandemic

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who expressed ideas that women did not belong in the law or medical professions in her book, A Treatise on Domestic Economy? A)
    11·1 answer
  • What was the impact of civil war on civil liberties?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the main reason imperialists in the United States wanted to annex the Philippines after the Spanish-American War?
    13·1 answer
  • Which best explains how railroad companies were able to standardize their timetables in 1883?
    6·2 answers
  • How does Monroe's speech communicate a strategy for both peacetime and military action, if provoked?
    14·1 answer
  • 2) What does Grady mean by “general summary the free Negro counts more than he did as a slave”?
    13·1 answer
  • To determine how many Electoral College votes a state has, which of the following would you need to know?
    9·1 answer
  • Griots used music, dance, and _____ (HELP)
    10·1 answer
  • Who is the founder of mughal empire
    5·1 answer
  • What was the importance of James fenimore cooper
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!