Which is an example of ethical investing?

you texpect to receive a payout from a trust fund in 3 years. The payout will be for $11000. You plan to invest the money at an

MrMuchimi

Answer:

11.68 years

Explanation:

For computing the number of years first we have to applied the NPER formula i.e to be shown in the attachment below:

Given that,

Present value = $11,000

Future value = $19,000

Rate of interest = 6.5%

PMT = $0

The formula is shown below:

= NPER(Rate;PMT;-PV;FV;type)

The present value come in negative

So, after applying the above formula, the number of years is 8.68

Now after 3 years, it would be

= 8.68 + 3

= 11.68 years

3 0

4 years ago

Which of the following is NOT correct about causal regression analysis of the form Y = f(X)? A. Selection of the appropriate cau

Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

A. Selection of the appropriate causal variable Y is important

Explanation:

We have this function, Y = f(X).

From this function we can see that Y is dependent on X. That is, it is a function of X. Y is not a causal variable. A causal variable is a variable that is able to influence the variable of interest. From this question Y is the variable of interest. It is the dependent variable. The independent variable is X and it is the causal variable.

Therefore the incorrect one is Selection of the appropriate causal variable Y is important

5 0

3 years ago

Tin-Tin Waste Management, Inc., is growing rapidly. Dividends are expected to grow at rates of 30 percent, 35 percent, 25 percen

scoundrel [369]

Answer:

The dividend for the current year (D0) is $2.15.

Explanation:

This can be calculated as follows:

Current dividend = D0

Next dividend = (1 + relevant growth rate) * Current dividend ........... (1)

Based on equation (1), we have:

D1 = (1 + 0.30) * D0 = 1.30D0

D2 = (1 + 0.35) * D1 = 1.35 * 1.30D0 = (1.35 * 1.30)D0 = 1.755D0

D3 = (1 + 0.25) * D2 = 1.25 * 1.755D0 = (1.25 * 1.755)D0 = 2.19375D0

D4 = (1 + 0.18) * D3 = 1.18 * 2.19375D0 = (1.18 * 2.19375)D0 = 2.588625D0

D5 = (1 + 0.07) * D4 = 1.07 * 2.588625D0 = (1.07 * 2.588625)D0 = 2.76982875D0

Using Gordon Growth stable formula, we have price in year 4 (P4) as follows:

P4 = D5/(required rate of return - Perpetual dividend growth rate) ........ (2)

Substituting all the relevant values to equation (2), we have:

P4 = 2.76982875D0/(0.16 - 0.07)

P4 =2.76982875D0/0.09

P4 = 30.775875D0

Since the market price is the sum of all the present values of dividends from year 1 to 4 and P4, we have:

$47.85 = (D1 / (1 + required rate of return)^1) + (D2 / (1 + required rate of return)^2) + (D3 / (1 + required rate of return)^3) + (D4 / (1 + required rate of return)^4) + (P4 / (1 + required rate of return)^4) ...........(3)

Substituting all the relevant values to equation (3), we have:

$47.85 = (1.30D0 / 1.16^1) + (1.755D0 / 1.16^2) + (2.19375D0 / 1.16^3) + (2.588625D0 / 1.16^4) + (30.775875D0 / 1.16^4)

$47.85 = [(1.3 / 1.16^1) + (1.755 / 1.16^2) + (2.19375 / 1.16^3) + (2.588625 / 1.16^4) + (30.775875 / 1.16^4)]D0

$47.85 = 22.2572996535323D0

D0 = $47.85 / 22.2572996535323

D0 = $2.15

Therefore, the dividend for the current year (D0) is $2.15.

5 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is a complex process of encoding and decoding information, ideas, and feelings?

coldgirl [10]

Answer:

The correct answer is Communication.

Explanation:

A communicative act among humans is a complex process. And it is because the meaning, the communicable, the "truth" of the communicable, is inextricably linked to the incommunicable. The truth and the communicable are always hooked, overdetermined and produced inside and outside the scope of a given act of communicative interaction.

Contrary to the idea that an act of communicative interaction is something simple, I think that an act of communicative interaction is a complex process because it integrates previous communicative acts and implies and is implied by subjective and cultural features that carry contradictions and paradoxes in their saddles. typical of the relationship between the incommunicable and the communicable. That said more radically: the communicable also involves the incommunicable; and you have to count on it and it.

3 0

3 years ago

The price elasticities of supply and demand affect A. the tax incidence but not the size of the deadweight loss from a tax. B. b

stira [4]

Answer:

B. both the size of the deadweight loss from a tax and the tax incidence

Explanation:

The price elasticities of demand & supply are : buyers' & sellers' - demand & supply responsiveness to price change.

On levy of indirect tax - whose burden can be shared between buyers & sellers ; it affects tax incidence & deadweight loss both :-

More tax burden shifts on buyers if demand is more inelastic, more tax burden shifts on sellers if supply is more inelastic.
Deadweight loss is the effect of tax re allocation, benefitting neither of consumer surplus, producer surplus, government revenue. It is less when demand &, or supply are more inelastic

4 0

4 years ago