Answer:
Option D.The author's attitude toward a subject.
Explanation:
Answer:
Library Catalogue Database
Explanation:
i got it correct on a study island
Answer:
The beginning of the earth, along with the birth of humans is one of the biggest and most contentious issues among creationists and evolutionists. Scientific theory holds the opinion that the universe is eternal, while the Bible states that there is a beginning. It has been proven that there was an official beginning; the question that arises is when that exact beginning took place, a time where there was neither time nor space nor matter. Christianity uses the Old Testament to describe the beginning of life. In the span of six days, God created the heavens, the earth, the sun, moon, water, animals, and ended with the finalé of human beings. Other major events such as Noah’s flood occurred along the lifespan of the earth, accounting for the distribution of fossils and the formation of the earth’s layers Evolution is defined as “the development by natural causes of all organisms, those today and those yesterday, from other forms probably ultimately much simpler and originally perhaps from non-living substances. According to evolutionists, the earth began approximately 4.5 billion years ago, with the explosion of life beginning around 55 million years ago. To evolutionists, the starting of life began as inorganic molecules that underwent a natural transformation (through electricity or heat) to become organic molecules. These building blocks joined to form macromolecule chains that eventually made up organisms.
Answer:
- Correct decision:
E). Mario should not use the source.
- Justification:
H). It has not been peer reviewed.
Explanation:
While conducting research, it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the sources as it may affect the worth or significance of the research. In order to ensure the reliability of the source, peer-reviewed sources are considered scholarly and authentic, as it contains information written or approved by a team of experts.
In the given situation, Mario should be suggested, not to use the source with a justification that it has not been peer-reviewed that implies, it has not been reviewed by the experts. This makes the source less reliable and hence should not be used for the research.
i guess that get up is the answer
