1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darina [25.2K]
3 years ago
11

PLEASE WORK HARD AND FAST AND I WILL MARK YOU BRAINLIST

History
2 answers:
Nadya [2.5K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

[A speedy removal] will relieve the whole State of Mississippi and the western part of Alabama of Indian occupancy, and enable those States to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power. It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will [slow down] the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the Government and through the influence of good counsels, to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community. . . . The consequences of a speedy removal will be important to the United States, to individual States, and to the Indians themselves. . . . It will place a dense and civilized population in large tracts of country now occupied by a few savage hunters.

–President Andrew Jackson, 1830

Explanation:

In 1830 Henry Clay, one of the most prominent members of the House of Representatives, spoke out against American Indian removal. In this speech, he quotes from an 1814 statement by the US government that says American Indians have a legal right to their lands and are not subject to US laws. The United States stand charged with the fate of those poor children of the woods, in the face of their common Maker, and in presence of the world. And as certain as the guardian is answerable for the education of his infant [child], and the management of his estate, will they be responsible here and hereafter. . . . “The Indians [living] within the United States are so far independent that they live under their own customs, and not under the laws of the United States; that their rights upon the lands where they inhabit or hunt are secured to them by boundaries defined in [friendly] treaties between the United States and themselves; and that whenever those boundaries [are changed, they will] receive from the United States ample [payment] for . . . the land ceded by them.”

–Henry Clay, 1830 Im sorry i am not much use but can i have brainliest please!!!

MrRissso [65]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Jackson warned the tribes that if they failed to move, they would lose their independence and fall under state laws. Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
during world war 1, which countries were part of the the allied powers and which were part of the central powers
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

The Allies of World War I or Entente Powers were the coalition of countries led by France, Britain, Russia, Italy and Japan against the Central Powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria and their colonies during the First World War (1914–1918).

plz mrk it as brainliest.

8 0
3 years ago
What protections do King James and the English govbernment promise to colonists?
Serhud [2]
Chief among the promised protections were that all people born in the colonies were granted the same rights of British citizens elsewhere in the world. James and the English government also promised to compensate and protect the colonists in case they were robbed


Hope it’s right...
6 0
3 years ago
What is the best definition of the term hawks?
umka21 [38]
The best definition of the term hawks is people who call for U.S. military intervention abroad. The correct answer is B. 
6 0
4 years ago
How did colonization lead to the diversity in Peru
valkas [14]
The Spanish im not 100% sure
4 0
3 years ago
Why could the american revolution be thought of as a world war? A. Britain declared war on other countries to try to gain their
9966 [12]

C.

_______________________________________________________________

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the han emperors create a monopoly on iron and salt
    15·1 answer
  • 9. How did the social class with the largest number of people contribute to early civilizations ?
    9·1 answer
  • Who has the final athority for interpreting the constitusion
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the fight for equality and freedom make women and enslaved African Americans question their position in society
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!! ASAP!!!! GIVING 40 POINTS +BRAINLIEST (if correct) + THANKYOU!!!!! (On both profile and answer)
    12·1 answer
  • The use of pools and holding companies benefited which of these groups during the late 19th century and early 20th century
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT one of Jefferson's characteristics for the American Republic?
    15·1 answer
  • Why is cyanide such an effective poison? You might be surprised to learn that it directly interferes with cellular respiration t
    8·2 answers
  • What cities and countries were<br> mentioned in the news this week?
    5·1 answer
  • What did the United States provide Britain at the beginning of the war?<br><br> I NEED THIS ASAP
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!