Answer:
8.7304 x 1010
Step-by-step explanation:
I think its that >_<
The last 10 is supposed to be on top to the right of the 10
Answer:
First choice.
Step-by-step explanation:
You could plug in the choices to see which would make all the 3 equations true.
Let's start with (x=2,y=-6,z=1):
2x+y-z=-3
2(2)+-6-1=-3
4-6-1=-3
-2-1=-3
-3=-3 is true so the first choice satisfies the first equation.
5x-2y+2z=24
5(2)-2(-6)+2(1)=24
10+12+2=24
24=24 is true so the first choice satisfies the second equation.
3x-z=5
3(2)-1=5
6-1=5
5=5 is true so the first choice satisfies the third equation.
We don't have to go any further since we found the solution.
---------Another way.
Multiply the first equation by 2 and add equation 1 and equation 2 together.
2(2x+y-z=-3)
4x+2y-2z=-6 is the first equation multiplied by 2.
5x-2y+2z=24
----------------------Add the equations together:
9x+0+0=18
9x=18
Divide both sides by 9:
x=18/9
x=2
Using the third equation along with x=2 we can find z.
3x-z=5 with x=2:
3(2)-z=5
6-z=5
Add z on both sides:
6=5+z
Subtract 5 on both sides:
1=z
Now using the first equation along with 2x+y-z=-3 with x=2 and z=1:
2(2)+y-1=-3
4+y-1=-3
3+y=-3
Subtract 3 on both sides:
y=-6
So the solution is (x=2,y=-6,z=1).
Honestly I can see an argument for 7 shelves or for 8 shelves.
When you do the calculation;

You get 7.15 shelves. Clearly you cannot have .15 of a shelf so the logician in me wants to say you need 8 shelves!
But if the assignment is aimed estimation skills, (Which is what I assume is being implied by the title of the assignment), then the easier calculation of

is probably what the teacher was hoping for.
You might have been accidentally been calculating

. Remember division is NOT communitive! i.e.

.
From the image;
The first step was to see that 59 can not go into 4..resulting in the zero above the 4, multiplying 0 by 59 and subtracting 0 from 4.
The second step begins by bringing down the 2, seeing that 59 can not go into 42..resulting in the zero above the 2, multiplying 0 by 59 and subtracting 0 from 42.
The third step begins by bringing down the 2, seeing that 59 can go into 422 7 times (I tested this on the right by a short multiplication problem)..resulting in the 7 above the 2, multiplying 7 by 59 and subtracting 413 from 42.
This process continues....
Determine whether the relation is a function. {(−3,−6),(−2,−4),(−1,−2),(0,0),(1,2),(2,4),(3,6)}
Gennadij [26K]
Answer:
The relation is a function.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order for the relation to be a function, every input must only have one output. Basically, you can't have 2 outputs for 1 input but you can have 2 inputs for 1 output. Looking at all of the points in the relation, we see that no input has multiple outputs, so the answer is yes, the relation is a function.
Answer:
The top option is false.
Step-by-step explanation:
Both segments have a <em>rate</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>change</em><em> </em>[<em>slope</em>] of ⅔. It just that their ratios have unique qualities:

Greatest Common Factor: 2
___ ___
<em>BC</em><em> </em>is at a 4⁄6 slope, and <em>AB</em><em> </em>is at a ⅔ slope. Although their quantities are unique, they have the exact same value.
I am joyous to assist you anytime.