Answer: $900000
Explanation:
The second step in any substantive analytical procedures decision process is to determine or calculate a tolerable difference. Since the expectation developed by the auditor will slightly be identical to the client's recorded amount, the auditor must make a decision about the amount of difference that would require further investigation. The size of the tolerable difference relies on the significance of the account, the desired degree of reliance on the analytical procedure, the level of disaggregation in the amount being tested, and the precision of the expectation.
In the above statement,
The tolerable misstatement= 50%
Income before taxes= $36million
5% benchmark appropriate for planning materiality.
Therefore,
The tolerable difference for the analytical procedure:
$36million × 0.05 × 0.5
= $900000
Exchange rates are an effective way to analyze the price of one currency in terms of another currency with the tools of demand and supply.
<h3>What do you mean by exchange rate?</h3>
Exchange rates refer to the value of one's nation's currency over the currency of another nation.
An exchange rate can be fixed or free-floating. A fixed exchange rate is pegged to the value of other currency and a free-floating exchange rate may rise or fall due to changes in the foreign exchange market.
Thus, exchange rates are an effective way to analyze the price of one currency in terms of another currency with the tools of demand and supply.
Learn more about the exchange rate here:
brainly.com/question/14930716
#SPJ1
The answer is<u> "efficiency is increased".</u>
An assembly line is a manufacturing process in which compatible parts are added to an item in a successive way to make a final result. Much of the time, an assembling mechanical production system is a semi-mechanized framework through which an item moves. At each station along the line some piece of the generation procedure happens. The laborers and hardware used to create the thing are stationary along the line and the item travels through the cycle, from beginning to end.
Answer:
a. 1. You would want the regulatory boards to see more competition, so you would argue that the relevant market is all toys, which is as broad as possible. This would make it less likely that the merger would violate merger guidelines.
b. 2. You would want to use the narrowest definition of the market, which would be dolls. This would make it more likely that the merger would violate merger guidelines.
Explanation:
a. In order to avoid anti-trust laws, it would be best that Mattel convinces the authorities that the relevant category is all toys not just a subsection. This will show that the toys made by the new company would have a lot of competition from other toy makers across the board which would reduce their chances of being a monopoly and violate merger guidelines.
b. As the bid is unsolicited, Hasbro might want to defend against it. In which case their strategy should be the exact opposite of that of Mattel and they should try to convince the regulatory boards that they would be in the narrowest of markets which would be dolls. This would mean that the merger has a strong chance of leading to a monopoly and would violate merger guidelines.
An example of a run on sentence is: I love to do gymnastics I would do it every single day if I could.
