Answer:
Explanation:2. What can be done today is to confront it and educate it to people to they are aware of our history and can know to to do better and think about what COULD have been done better. The government can make amends by awknowledging it and not being afraid to adress it....3. I think they would choose another policy different from the one used in ww2 because frankly its inhumane and people today tend to be alot more proggressive and innovative so they would most likley come up with a different solution.
Answer:
<u>The term can also be used to refer to trade over bodies of water </u>
Explanation:
Hope it helpe
Answer:
what do you mean by mmmmm
Explanation:
John Julius Norwich makes a point of saying in the introduction to his history of the popes that he is “no scholar” and that he is “an agnostic Protestant.” The first point means that while he will be scrupulous with his copious research, he feels no obligation to unearth new revelations or concoct revisionist theories. The second means that he has “no ax to grind.” In short, his only agenda is to tell us the story. Norwich declares that he is an agnostic Protestant with no axe to grind: his aim is to tell the story of the popes, from the Roman period to the present, covering them neither with whitewash nor with ridicule. Even more disarmingly, he insists that he has no pretensions to scholarship and writes only for “the average intelligent reader”. But he adds: “I have tried to maintain a certain lightness of touch.” And that, it seems, is the opening through which a fair amount of outrageous anecdote and Gibbonian dry wit is allowed to enter the narrative.
