The faulty logic that the given sentence contains is B. Either-or Fallacy. An either-or fallacy is the limiting of possible answers into two or it is oversimplifying. In the given sentence above, it only gives two possible answers: either meeting the deadline, or if not the town will suffer.
Answer:
In a sentence, WHO and WHOM have different syntactic functions.
Explanation:
WHO
- WHO can be used as the subject of a sentence. For example, "who is your brother?"
- WHO can be replaced by he or she.
WHOM
- WHOM is used as the object of the verb or object of a preposition as in "who is helping whom?" or "I know the person to whom the letter was addressed" respectively.
- WHOM can be replaced by him or her.
The author of Passage 1 would most likely criticize the author of Passage 2 forD) underestimating the consequences of technological issues
<h3>What is a Literary Criticism?</h3>
This refers to the act of judging or making comments about a thing, usually in a disparaging manner.
Hence, we can see that based on the complete information, there is the narration by two authors in different passages as they talk about the effects of globalization and technology.
The 2nd author understates the effects of tech issues, which the first author would likely criticize him for.
Read more about literary criticisms here:
brainly.com/question/301493
#SPJ1
The literary elements of a fable.......include animal characters with human characteristics<span>, a </span>setting<span> and situation, a problem or dilemma, usually caused by a </span>character<span> trait of weakness, a resolution, and a clear moral or lesson at the end of the </span>story<span>,</span>
