Answer:
Avoiding conflict can be an appropriate choice, depending on the circumstances.
Explanation:
According to Thomas-Kilmann avoiding is an appropriate form of dealing with conflict when used in the following situations: When an issue is trivial and other issues are more important or pressing - use time and effort where it will be most productive.
Answer:
I would say the Third one.
Explanation:
Because it's about how the animals overthrow the farmer and pretty much think of the farm as their own.
The correct matching of the irony are:
- It uses an unexpected reversal of the character's or reader's expectations or assumptions. Situational Irony
- It occurs when the reader knows a fact that is hidden from one or more characters. Dramatic Irony
<h3>What is Dramatic Irony?</h3>
This refers to the type of irony where the audience is aware of what will happen, but the characters are not aware
Hence, we can see that the final matching of the ironies given is:
It involves a sharp contrast between what a character says and what he or she really means. Verbal Irony
Read more about verbal irony here:
brainly.com/question/1551288
#SPJ1
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The main idea is to present the feelings the person had before amazon became what it is today. I had my own misgivings about ordering on line until I realized that I really had no choice. I live in a small community of about 800 people. There is a Walmart in the next town over (which has a population of 5000), but I'm not fond of what they did to small businesses.
So the choice was shop at a place I don't like or order through the mail. I didn't really make up my mind until about 2 years ago. Then it was fine.
The author of what you quoted had many of the same feelings. It's a gamble putting money where the system can be broken into and that is what this is all about -- fear of trying something you don't trust.
The answer is B, I think
</h2><h2>Explanation:</h2>