1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vesnalui [34]
3 years ago
9

Write an essay that answers the following question: Was the United States justified in going to war against Mexico in 1846? Use

primary source material on pages 3-5 of this document and the information in Chapter 16 to help you answer the question and provide support for your answer. [ Read the passage now]---> Except from James Polk's 1845 Inaugural Address: Eighty years ago population was confined on the west by the ridge of the Alleghenies. Within that period... our people... have filled the eastern valley of the Mississippi, adventurously ascended the Missouri to its headsprings, and are already engaged in establishing the blessings of self-government in valleys of which the rivers flow to the pacific. The world beholds the peaceful triumphs of the industry of our emigrants. To us belongs the duty of protecting them adequately wherever they may be upon our soil. U.S. Army Officer, Regarding the April 24, 1847, Skirmish Between Mexican and American Forces. We have not one particle of right to be here. It looks as if the government sent a small force on purpose to bring a war, so as to have a pretext for taking California and as much of this country as it chooses. Excerpts from Polk's Message to congress, May 11, 1846: The existing state of the relations between the United States and Mexico renders it proper that I should bring the subject to the consideration of Congress. The strong desire to establish peace with Mexico on liberal and honorable terms, and the readiness of this Government to regulate and adjust our boundary and other causes of difference with that power on such fair and equitable principles as would lead to permanent relations of the most friendly nature. The Mexican Government not only refused to receive him [ the U.S. envoy] or listen to his propositions, but after a long-continued series of menaces have at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil. I had ordered an efficient military force to take a position between the Nueces and the Del Norte. This had become necessary to meet a threatened invasion of Texas by the Mexican forces. The invasion was threatened solely because Texas had determined, in accordance with a solemn resolution of the Congress of the United States, to annex herself to our Union, and under these circumstances it was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil. Texas, by the final action of our Congress, had become an integral part of our Union. The Congress of Texas, by its act of December 19, 1836, had declared the Rio del Norte to be the boundary of that Republic. Our own Congress had, moreover, with great unanimity, by the act approved December 31, 1845, recognized the country beyond the Nueces as a part of our territory. Accordingly, on the 13th of January last instructions were issued to the general in command of these troops to occupy the left bank of the Del Norte. This river, which is the southwestern boundary of the State of Texas, is an exposed frontier. The Army moved from Corpus Christi on the 11th of March, and on the 28th of that month arrived on the left bank of the Del Norte opposite to Matamoras, where it encamped on a commanding position, which has since been strengthened by the erection of fieldworks. General Ampudia... notified General Taylor to break up his camp within twenty-four hours and to retire beyond the Nueces River, and in the event of his failure to comply with these demands announced that arms, and arms alone, must decide the question. A party of dragoons of 63 men and officers were... dispatched from the American camp up the Rio del Norte, on its left bank. to ascertain whether the Mexican troops had crossed or were preparing to cross the river, became engaged with a large body of these troops, and after a short affair, in which some 16 were killed and wounded, appear to have been surrounded and compelled to surrender. The grievous wrongs perpetrated by Mexico upon our citizens throughout a long period of years remain unredressed, and solemn treaties pledging her public faith for this redness have been disregarded. Mexico has repeatedly threatened to make war upon us for the purpose of reconquering Texas. In the meantime we have tried every effort at reconciliation. Mexico... has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. She has ​

History
1 answer:
lana [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:Answer:

I would say that Yes, the United States was and is justified for going to war against Mexico in 1846. The reason for this is because in 1884, Mexico started the War when they attacked the Army that was led by General Zachary Taylor who was order by the United States to defend the territory on the Rio Grande that was in fact claimed by the United States of America. But, it was owned as a consequence because of the treaty between Texas and Mexico when Texas first became independent.

The United States of America tried to be peaceful and negotiate the disputed territory that had once been part of Texas. The United States of America did this by sending John Slidell to Mexico City that was empowered at that time to offer Mexico substantial amounts of money for the disputed territory.

IF, big IF, the United States of America had seriously provoked the war and would have taken advantage of the fuzziness that was going on with the relevant treaties, then the people in the relevant regions which included Texas and Alta California, would have been better off under the control of America then they would if they were under control of Mexico. And the reason for this is because while this was all going on, Mexico was corrupt and confused at the time because of the Presidency changing hands rapidly and also because of the democratic traditions being abandoned along the way. AND, in some cases but very few, there were settlers that were originally Americans, had asked to be part of the United States of America!!

Now, the only basis that Mexico could claim was any superior lands right to rule that piece of land was that they had to conquer that piece of land first. Now the Spanish aristocracy of Mexico didn’t even have an “original village settler” to claim the lands. The reason for that is Mexico had already acquired them by conquering and displacing the Indian and Mesoamerican inhabitants.

Explanation: just took the test

You might be interested in
Why did Judaism spread around the world starting about 132 CE?
faltersainse [42]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How did the victors deal with the destroyed countries of japan and germany
Elan Coil [88]
They helped them rebuild. The UN helped west Germany rebuild and become a democratic state, instead if charging them tons of money like in 1918. They did the same with Japan.

Why this answer is excellent...

Original ✅

Sufficient✅

Brianliest-Worthy ✅
5 0
2 years ago
The____movement worked to ban the sale of alcohol nationwide.
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

The temperance movement, which sought to ban the production and sale of alcoholic beverages, succeeded in pushing their principles into law with the passage of the Eighteenth Amendment, also in 1919.

Explanation:

Hope This Helps! Please mark Branliest if you can! :)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Elaborate How did authors of the 1920s use their writing to comment on American
emmainna [20.7K]
  • KAY GALLANT: Most Americans approved strongly of the economic growth and improved living conditions during the nineteen twenties. They supported the conservative Republican policies of President Calvin Coolidge. And they had great faith in the country's business leaders and economic system.

  • HARRY MONROE: The spirit of protest was especially strong in serious American writing during the nineteen twenties. Many of the greatest writers of this period hated the new business culture.

  • BOB DOUGHTY: Welcome to THE MAKING OF A NATION – American history in VOA Special English.

IamSugarBee

4 0
3 years ago
After the death of Queen Elizabeth I, there was constant conflict between her successors and Parliament, which eventually led to
FromTheMoon [43]
Hi! :)

Answer: He led attacks on pro-slavery residents and quickly became a hero in the eyes of northern extremists, also in 1859, him and 21 of his followers attacked and occupied the federal arsenal in Harper's Ferry.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Article i of the constitution and the bill of rights ensures that government is what only those powers granted by the people
    13·1 answer
  • Who seized power at the end of the French Revolution
    11·1 answer
  • How did Rome's expansion after the Punic Wars affect Rome's social development? (4 points)
    8·2 answers
  • In what ways did two cultures contribute to the Southwest's unique culture in the early 1800's?
    13·1 answer
  • Realism is a style of art that _____.
    9·1 answer
  • What is the first step Anton is likely to take if he suspects that his computer is not able to access the Internet?
    10·2 answers
  • How can the vicious cycle of child labor help explain the major issues impacting Latin America?
    7·1 answer
  • How many miles of roads did the Inca build?
    15·2 answers
  • How did Anne Hutchinson influence the development of the Massachusetts Bay Colony?
    7·1 answer
  • Should the Qing be seen as foreign rulers over China?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!