Answer with Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that
Average per week in sales = $8000
Steve hopes that the results of a trial selling period will enable him to conclude that the compensation plan increase the average sales per salesperson
So, the appropriate null and alternate hypothesis would be

b. What is the Type I error in this situation? What are the consequences of making this error?
Type 1 error are those errors in which null hypothesis are supposed to be rejected, but it does not get rejected.
It means sales per week is greater than $8000 but in actual it is not.
c. What is the Type II error in this situation? What are the consequences of making this error?
Type 2 are error are those errors in which null hypothesis are supposed to be accepted but it get rejected.
It means average sales per week is actually $8000 but it is calculated that average sales is less than $8000.
A baseball player made six hits in nine innings.
Therefore, his ratio of hits to innings, which means his number of hits relative to the number of innings, is 6:9.
However, this isn't simplified. To simplify a ratio, we must find the GCF (Greatest Common Factor) of the two terms.
The GCF of 6 and 9 is 3, thus, we divide both of the terms by 3 to get our simplified answer.
6:9 = 6/3 : 9/3 = 2:3
Your answer is that the ratio of hits to innings for the baseball player is 2:3. (This can also be expressed as 2/3 or 2 to 3.)
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
y<2/3x-1
Step-by-step explanation:
plotted point is on -1
slope of the line is rise 2, run 3
so its the last option
Hello,
I don't see a graph you can edit your answer by putting a graph then I can help you.
Your friend --- Young Sinatra
(3x19.95+23.5+124.95)1.05=
59.85+23.5+124.95 =208.3
208.3×1.05=218.715