Is this alternate interior angles converse?

Mathematics

1 answer:

zaharov [31]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

yes DUH

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Can someone please help me on this question?

yan [13]

Answer: q³⁰

Explanation:

First just solve the first part using the exponent rules

p²q⁵ becomes 1/p-⁸q-²⁰ then we flip the fraction so the exponents become positive. Now we have p⁸q²⁰.

Before multiplying the other equation, we must simplify. p-⁴q⁵ becomes 1/p⁴q-⁵ and since it's the exponents being raised to a power we simply multiply the inner exponents times the outer exponent which yields 1/p⁸q-¹⁰. We must make q-¹⁰ positive so we will then bring it to the numerator of the fraction which gives us: q¹⁰/p⁸.

Multiply q¹⁰/p⁸ * p⁸q²⁰/1 = p⁸q³⁰/p⁸ divide the p exponents by each other which yields 0 since when u divide exponents you just subtract them so 8 - 8 = 0. Your answer is now q³⁰/1 or just q³⁰

4 0

3 years ago

I need help with 1 and 2

oee [108]

1) -149, -1; -148, -2; -147, -3
2) No, according to the commutative property of addition, it does not matter the order they are put in.

Hope this helps!

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which transformations can be used to map a triangle with vertices A(2, 2), B(4, 1), C(4, 5) to A’(–2, –2), B’(–1, –4), C’(–5, –4

jek_recluse [69]

Notice that every pair of point (x, y) in the original picture, has become (-y, -x) in the transformed figure.

Let ABC be first transformed onto A"B"C" by a 90° clockwise rotation.

Notice that B(4, 1) is mapped onto B''(1, -4). So the rule mapping ABC to A"B"C" is (x, y)→(y, -x)

so we are very close to (-y, -x).

The transformation that maps (y, -x) to (-y, -x) is a reflection with respect to the y-axis. Notice that the 2. coordinate is same, but the first coordinates are opposite.

ANSWER:

"<span>a 90 clockwise rotation about the origin and a reflection over the y-axis</span>"