Chesapeake colonies had rich soil and temperate climates which made large-scale plantation farming possible. The regions had an agriculture-based economy in which cash crops like tobacco, indigo, and cotton were cultivated for trade.
<h3>What was the Chesapeake's social structure like in the 1700s?</h3>
- Low life expectancy (largely due to disease), reliance on indentured servitude, weak family life, and a hierarchical structure dominated by planters at the top over masses of poor white and black slaves at the bottom characterized seventeenth-century Chesapeake society.
- The merchants, vendors, and small farmers of the colonies were the largest social class in the South and Chesapeake regions. These were ordinary citizens, moderately educated and skilled, but eager to work hard and build the America they desired.
- The Chesapeake colony of Maryland, granted by Charles I to Sir George Calvert, the first Lord Baltimore, was one of the first proprietary colonies, or colonies owned by an individual rather than a joint-stock company.
To learn more about Chesapeake bay colonies refer to
brainly.com/question/876887
#SPJ4
Answer:
Americans fears shape the whole wide world
Explanation:
oh yes they did
There are 6 official languages in the UN
Answer:
Option: A. The Inca created a politically unified empire, while the Aztecs granted more independence to conquered territories.
Explanation:
The Incas expanded and unified their territory after several conquests. Inca society rigidly organized, from the emperor, royal family, and the peasants. The Inca civilization tried to unify other conquered villages by establishing new rulers who were loyal to Incas and declaring their language Quechua as official. The Incas didn't want the people they conquered to have too much power.
The Aztec civilization tried to unify other conquered towns by conducting alliances or partnership to build their empire. They granted independence to the newly conquered territories. The new territories of the empire expected to pay tribute and taxes to the King. In most of the part, their local leaders were allowed to govern.
The impact that is made in the events of 1970 and 1971 on the actions of Nixon in Vietnam is that his administration never made an iron-clad pledge based on the secured infringement of the Soviet <span> hegemony. Hope this answers your question. </span>
