This Would Be Where The Lawyer Take Place. Depending On The Crime Committed The Judge/Lawyer Decides Wether The Defendant Is Either Guilty Or Not Guilty. From Here The Lawyer Would Continue Working With The Defendant If Proved Guilty.
During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was unfairly prejudicial. ... If an appeals court finds that the evidence against Emerly should have been excluded, she can receive a new trial.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Stuffing envelopes with information about a candidate to send to voters.
Explanation:
<em>Technically</em>, they are all ways of participation within a election campaign, whether it is direct or indirect participation, or participation from the result of such campaign. However, the most direct way that a citizen participates that may help with the campaign is A), as they are actively participating in the process of sending out (mostly positive) information on their own candidate in hopes of getting he/she enough votes to win.
Learning about candidates may be a indirect way of participating in an election, as one must understand the candidates to adequately be able to vote. However, it is not exactly a participation within a election campaign, though it may lead to it.
Learning about the process of how to register to vote is a citizen actively trying to meet the requirements in order to be able to participate directly in the booth, but does not exactly help with a election campaign directly.
Watching a debate also does not help with a election campaign. A debate is typically hosted by a third party, and after deciding on the campaign they like the most, they may join the party and actively help then, but they are not exactly participating in a campaign during the debate.
Therefore, A would be your best answer.
~
Answer:
A
Explanation:
But if its wrong you should pick B
