I do not have a definite answer for you but if you listen the Broadway show Hamilton it focuses on the federalists a lot since Alexander Hamilton was a federalist. The show is 98% historically accurate only minor things like times supporting characters were married or things like that for plot purposes.
Explanation:
translation = Why are religious and moral norms not coercible?
The relationship between religion and morality has long been hotly debated. Does religion make us more moral? Is it necessary for morality? Do moral inclinations emerge independently of religious intuitions? These debates, which nowadays rumble on in scientific journals as well as in public life, have frequently been marred by a series of conceptual confusions and limitations. Many scientific investigations have failed to decompose “religion” and “morality” into theoretically grounded elements; have adopted parochial conceptions of key concepts—in particular, sanitized conceptions of “prosocial” behavior; and have neglected to consider the complex interplay between cognition and culture. We argue that to make progress, the categories “religion” and “morality” must be fractionated into a set of biologically and psychologically cogent traits, revealing the cognitive foundations that shape and constrain relevant cultural variants. We adopt this fractionating strategy, setting out an encompassing evolutionary framework within which to situate and evaluate relevant evidence. Our goals are twofold: to produce a detailed picture of the current state of the field, and to provide a road map for future research on the relationship between religion and morality.

Answer – D (Banquet cannot make changes to the doors without
undue hardship)
To successfully defend against art's claim, banquet will have to
show that they cannot make changes to the doors without undue hardship. Under
the Americans with disabilities act, employers who do not accommodate
the needs of persons with disabilities must prove that doing so would cause
undue hardship.<span>
</span>
Took action that violated the criminal law
Well, often when explorers explored the world, they had a goal. Whether a goal was to spread a religion or conquest a place, there was always a goal. When the explorers for example tried to conquer a place, casualties often occurred. Which effected the amount of people in the population. Another example is when explorers were trying to spread a religion, the population changed.
Welcome:)