<span>i think the article would be very likely geared towards Winning the publics favor to prevent passing the bill.
They will probably form an interest group so the bill will not pass. If the bill passed, it will potentially reduce their potential income from that age group</span>
When the price increased<span> two things happened: (1) plywood was rationed </span>to<span> its most important uses (not doghouses or decks), and (2) the high </span>prices<span> were an incentive for more plywood </span>to <span>be ... As we </span>can<span> see on the demand graph, there is an inverse relationship between </span>price<span> and </span>quantity <span>demanded.</span>
Answer:
The paper will run out.
Lots of animals will lose their habitats. (80% of animals survive in forests, they might die without them)
Will impact global warming.
Release alot of CO2 (carbon dioxide).
Will increase the greenhouse effect. (These 3 go together)
Oxygen might possibility be greatly reduced. (Rainforest provide nearly 20% of oxygen)
There will be no rain. (Trees absorb the water and released it)
Dead wood will increase (wild)fires.
Greatly impact the water cycle. (Trees keep ground wet)
I know there is only 2 needed but it might help others in the future.
Hope it helps!
False. Family does not perpetuate social inequality in the structural-functional approach. This is because this theory believes that all human interactions are related to how society functions. How a person's specific inclinations are based on values and morals he/she has shared bonds with in his immediate circle.
Answer:
A. 8%
Explanation:
In Canada, the 94% of the boreal forests are owned by the Government this means that the government can regulate how they are managed and how they're cut, in this case the Canadia Government protects 8% of the total countrie's forests for different reasons, it could be to protect it from deforestation, of because it is protected as a natural protected area.
