1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Setler79 [48]
2 years ago
15

In what way was the Sherman Antitrust Act successful?

History
2 answers:
s344n2d4d5 [400]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It allowed the government to break up the trust arrangement that the Standard Oil company had.

Explanation:

Maksim231197 [3]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It allowed the government to break up the trust arrangement that the Standard Oil company had.

Explanation:

Approved July 2, 1890, The Sherman Anti-Trust Act was the first Federal act that outlawed monopolistic business practices.

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the first measure passed by the U.S. Congress to prohibit trusts. It was named for Senator John Sherman of Ohio, who was a chairman of the Senate finance committee and the Secretary of the Treasury under President Hayes. Several states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. The Sherman Antitrust Act was based on the constitutional power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. The Sherman Anti-Trust Act passed the Senate by a vote of 51–1 on April 8, 1890, and the House by a unanimous vote of 242–0 on June 20, 1890. President Benjamin Harrison signed the bill into law on July 2, 1890.

A trust was an arrangement by which stockholders in several companies transferred their shares to a single set of trustees. In exchange, the stockholders received a certificate entitling them to a specified share of the consolidated earnings of the jointly managed companies. The trusts came to dominate a number of major industries, destroying competition. For example, on January 2, 1882, the Standard Oil Trust was formed. Attorney Samuel Dodd of Standard Oil first had the idea of a trust. A board of trustees was set up, and all the Standard properties were placed in its hands. Every stockholder received 20 trust certificates for each share of Standard Oil stock. All the profits of the component companies were sent to the nine trustees, who determined the dividends. The nine trustees elected the directors and officers of all the component companies. This allowed the Standard Oil to function as a monopoly since the nine trustees ran all the component companies.

The Sherman Act authorized the Federal Government to institute proceedings against trusts in order to dissolve them. Any combination “in the form of trust or otherwise that was in restraint of trade or commerce among the several states, or with foreign nations” was declared illegal. Persons forming such combinations were subject to fines of $5,000 and a year in jail. Individuals and companies suffering losses because of trusts were permitted to sue in Federal court for triple damages. The Sherman Act was designed to restore competition but was loosely worded and failed to define such critical terms as “trust,” “combination,” “conspiracy,” and “monopoly.” Five years later, the Supreme Court dismantled the Sherman Act in United States v. E. C. Knight Company (1895). The Court ruled that the American Sugar Refining Company, one of the other defendants in the case, had not violated the law even though the company controlled about 98 percent of all sugar refining in the United States. The Court opinion reasoned that the company’s control of manufacture did not constitute a control of trade.

The Court’s ruling in E. C. Knight seemed to end any government regulation of trusts. In spite of this, during President Theodore Roosevelt’s “trust busting” campaigns at the turn of the century, the Sherman Act was used with considerable success. In 1904 the Court upheld the government’s suit to dissolve the Northern Securities Company in State of Minnesota v. Northern Securities Company. By 1911, President Taft had used the act against the Standard Oil Company and the American Tobacco Company. In the late 1990s, in another effort to ensure a competitive free market system, the Federal Government used the Sherman Act, then over 100 years old, against the giant Microsoft computer software company.

Resource Used:

https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=51

I hope this helps you in any shape or form.

You might be interested in
Help asap this is due TODAY. PLZ PLZ HELP
k0ka [10]
<span>1. Several hundred million 2. To lead to follow or to oppose 3. The purpose of the revolution was to overthrow the authority of the feudal landlord class. 4. Mao Zedong seems to be a very passionate very violent person. 5. He plans on bringing together all the peasants and executing a swift revolution against the upper class. 6. According to Mao Zedong the enemy was the rich landlords.
</span>
5 0
3 years ago
“No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family
natulia [17]
ITS A I HAD THAT QUESTION 5DAYS AGOkzksksks
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened to the maine​
Art [367]

Answer:

it blew up because of terroists

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Examine the transcript of the Plessy v. Ferguson case, focusing on the opinions of Justice Brown at [544-546] who spoke for the
jek_recluse [69]

There is no key difference in both case because the Supreme court ruled against discrimination against the blacks.

<h3>What happened in Plessy V Ferguson?</h3>

The ruling of the Supreme court in the cases of Plessy v. Ferguson upheld the Louisiana state law allowed for "equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored race"

<h3>What happened in Brown v. Board of Education?</h3>

The ruling of the Supreme court in the cases Brown v. Board of Education favored Oliver Brown whose daughter was not allowed to attend a school near her home due to discriminate against the black students.

In conclusion, there is no key difference in both case because the Supreme court ruled against discrimination against the blacks.

Read more about blacks discrimination

<em>brainly.com/question/13608616</em>

3 0
2 years ago
1. What were the 4 causes of WWI?<br>M-<br>A-<br>I-<br>N-​
a_sh-v [17]

Miltarism- growth of miltaries

Alliances

Imperiallism

Nationalism- pride in your on country

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ASAP<br> Explain the reasons for why the United States went to war with Spain in 1898.
    12·2 answers
  • De Soto explored the Western Hemisphere for what country?
    8·1 answer
  • Canada is home to an independence movement, in which a portion of the population wishes to have Quebec become an independent cou
    8·1 answer
  • Hacenida were build where
    6·2 answers
  • Why was the south angry about lincoln’s election as President
    12·1 answer
  • What is a civilization whose impact can be felt on history for a very long time called?
    11·1 answer
  • According to the map, most industrialization in Europe
    8·2 answers
  • HELP MMEH PLEASE I REALLY NEED YOUR HELP
    9·1 answer
  • Do you think Sullivan ballot fought for the north or south
    5·2 answers
  • What is the significance of the house of burgesses
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!