1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melisa1 [442]
3 years ago
15

What impact did the Three-Fifths Compromise have on the passage of the Constitution at the Philadelphia Convention?

History
2 answers:
erik [133]3 years ago
7 0

I believe the answer is A?

Stolb23 [73]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Politicians needed a compromise that would allow southerners the security of maintaing slavery.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement based on a compromise between the 13 original states in the United States, that a slave should count for 3/5 free men in the state's population when the seats of the newly-created House of Representatives were to be distributed. The agreement was passed on the Philadelphia Convention in 1787 and enshrined in the Constitution.

North States had originally argued that only free citizens should count when allocating seats in the House of Representatives. South states, on the other hand, had argued that the slaves should also be counted, as the slave southern states would thus be over-represented in the House of Representatives. The settlement was that a slave had to count for 3/5 free man and that this three-fifths man's owner was required to pay taxes for his slave.

As slaves were still not allowed to vote, the agreement gave the slave owners a clear political advantage as they thus constituted the majority of the population of the young union.

You might be interested in
Which of the following BEST summarizes the overall disagreement between the federalist and anti-federalists?
ivolga24 [154]

You didn't provide us with choices, so I'll simply provide some historical explanation.  The main issue was whether the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights added.

The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states.  Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA.  They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.

Federalists believed the Constitution itself clearly limited government power and protected the rights of the people.  Nevertheless, the addition of a Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided  reassurance to Anti-Federalists in the fight over ratification.  The compromise which led to agreement in regard to ratification of the Constitution was called the Massachusetts Compromise, because of major opposition to ratification that had existed in Massachusetts.  John Hancock and Samuel Adams (both of them anti-Federalists) were the ones who helped negotiate the compromise. The anti-Federalists agreed that they would support ratification of the Constitution, with the understanding that recommendations for amendments would follow if the Constitution was ratified.  The Federalists promised to support the proposed amendments, which would outline a Bill of Rights to guarantee protection of specific rights the anti-Federalists wanted specifically asserted in the Constitution.  

The US Constitution was ratified in 1788.  The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.

4 0
3 years ago
What city state had allies across the Aegean Sea
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
The City is Greece. Hoped I helped
6 0
3 years ago
What effect did united nations sanctions have on libya in 1992?
STatiana [176]
 <span>Libya turned over hijacking suspects for trial.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the proclamation of 1763 at the end of the french and indian war did the british officials reserved the land east o
ollegr [7]

Answer:

British officials reserved the land west of the Appalachian Mountains for American Indians.

Explanation:

King George Third issued the Royal Proclamation of 1763  on October 7, 1763. It was issued when Britain managed to acquire French areas in North America  after winning seven years war. The proclamation prohibited  any settlement west of Appalachian mountains. It was proclaimed to be an Indian reserve. Exclusion of the area beyond Appalachian mountain filled colonialists with  discontent and it arose during the American revolution.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The writers of the U.S. Constitution were most positively influenced by:
kozerog [31]
I think it the Boston tea party. But if iam wrong Iam so sorry look it up on google that may help
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Match the following items. 1. levied taxes on glass, paper, paint, lead, and tea George Rogers Clark 2. "Give me liberty or give
    14·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the World Health Organization (WHO)?
    13·1 answer
  • What causes of the Great War were emphasized in the video? What do you see as being the most critical cause? What did you learn
    10·1 answer
  • Which citation style did you learn to use in this course?
    8·2 answers
  • Name the Prime Minister of India?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did young men volunteer to be kamikazes? They had given up hope that Japan would win the war, and they wanted to die. They d
    14·1 answer
  • How were the allies victorious in the Soviet Union ?
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me real fast please help
    6·2 answers
  • Explain why or why not fear towards this group is justified.
    5·1 answer
  • How did the boston port act affect the colonists?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!