Answer:
Brayden should dispose of the gum
Explanation:
In the given scenario the law in Singapore states that having chewing gum is illegal. As far as Brayden is in Singapore he should comply with the law there.
The equal protection clause is a provision of law that states that all citizens must be treated equally under the law.
Although this gives one the right to take retain actions, in this case Brayden will be restricted from having chewing gum.
Of he is allowed to carry chewing gum then he expects to be treated differently from others in Singapore. This violates the equal protection clause
Answer:
a. First
Explanation:
The first amendment guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of the press, provisions also found in state constitutions. The first amendment was written as part of the Bill of Rights and completely prevents US citizens from being prohibited from exercising whatever religion they want, expressing themselves in any way they wish, and prevents the press from being censored.
I would do B but i don’t know
Answer:
In order of what you said,
1. Motion for Suppression
2. Motion for Continuance
3. Motion for Discovery
4. Motion for Bill of Particulars
Explanation:
I got this correct.
PLATO gang
Answer:
According to me...I won't feel confident when making that decision because that decision will be based on the rules that I must follow and I also believe that when I'm taking a decision is going to be based on what situation you are in.
So decisions are not suppose to be based on rules because everyone have a right to take or make a decision that is suitable for themselves.
