With the first one,you're going to want to use Ethos,or the appeal to emotions,for this to work. I would say this: There is an extent to which someone can be punished. If somebody committed murder,the death penalty,or more politely called "Capital Punishment",would honestly have no effect on them. It does not truly give them a chance to dwell on their actions and how they messed up someone's life. Not only that,but you also become a murderer if an innocent man is found guilty of a murder he didn't commit,which makes you no better than a murderer. Worse in fact because at least the person who actually did kill someone did it them selves and not with an executioner. I don't support Capital punishment because that puts someone else's blood on my hands.
As for the second one...I'd say this: By nature,humans are social creatures. We desire human contact and interaction. In fact,we NEED it in order to function normally. Capital Punishment only supports the tradition of "An Eye For An Eye And A Tooth For A Tooth." If you really want to punish someone,don't kill them physically,but instead mentally and socially. If you take away someone's ability to interact with people,it causes them to think back on their mistakes and it leaves them with no other choice but to confront their bad choices. Capital Punishment gets it over with quickly with no time to repent or ask for forgiveness,but life in prison with no chance of parole unless proven mentally capable by a team of psychologists,is by far the worst punishment you could ever give someone.
The prices for factor of production depends upon demand and supply of that particular factor of production
The Congress of Vienna<span> was convened in 1815 by the four European powers which had defeated Napoleon. The first goal was to establish a new balance of power in Europe which would prevent imperialism within Europe, such as the Napoleonic empire, and maintain the peace between the great powers.
Hope this helps!</span>
C - Mexico granted its norhter terrorities to the US. The US terrority now reached all the way to the Pacific Ocean in the west.
The Mexican American war resulted in the Treaty of Guadalupe and gave the US sovereignty over Texas and western terrorities.
Answer: option A is correct= self government.
Explanation:
The Mayflower compact, house of burgesses fundamental orders of connecticut" each of these terms dealt with the idea of SELF GOVERNMENT.
THE MAYFLOWER COMPACT was set up on a ship-'Mayflower' in the year 1620. The Mayflower Compact were set of rules that was established by English Settlers. The rules were set up for self governance.
===> THE HOUSE OF BURGESSES: the house of Burgesses was created in the year 1642. In British-North America colony, the house of Burgesses were assembly of elected representatives from Virginia. This help colonist to engage in self governance.
====>FUNDAMENTAL ORDERS OF CONNECTICUT: in order to be able to trade on water-ways(oceans) the Connecticut towns through their council on 14th of January, in 1639 set up their framework of governance called the fundamental orders of Connecticut.
