1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgen [1.6K]
3 years ago
10

Why is Islam Prevailent when the Prophet (SAW) even when he dies? For the next few centuries, Islam had a strong foothold. Why d

o you think Islam was so good even after the Prohet (SAW) died?
Your response will consider examples from three caliphates
History
2 answers:
Naddik [55]3 years ago
6 0
Islam at Muhammad’s death

Muhammad’s continuing success gradually impinged on the Quraysh in Mecca. Some defected and joined his community. His marriage to a Quraysh woman provided him with a useful go-between. In 628 he and his followers tried to make an Islamized hajj but were forestalled by the Meccans. At Al-Ḥudaybiyah, outside Mecca, Muhammad granted a 10-year truce on the condition that the Meccans would allow a Muslim pilgrimage the next year. Even at this point, however, Muhammad’s control over his followers had its limits; his more zealous followers agreed to the pact only after much persuasion. As in all instances of charismatic leadership, persisting loyalty was correlated with continuing success. In the next year the Meccans allowed a Muslim hajj; and in the next, 630, the Muslims occupied Mecca without a struggle. Muhammad began to receive deputations from many parts of Arabia. By his death in 632 he was ruler of virtually all of it.

The Meccan Quraysh were allowed to become Muslims without shame. In fact, they quickly became assimilated to the actual muhājirūn, even though they had not emigrated to Yathrib themselves. Ironically, in defeat they had accomplished much more than they would have had they achieved victory: the centralization of all of Arabia around their polity and their shrine, the Kaʿbah, which had been emptied of its idols to be filled with an infinitely greater invisible power.

Because intergroup conflict was banned to all members of the ummah on the basis of their shared loyalty to the emissary of a single higher authority, the limitations of the Meccan concept of ḥaram, according to which the city quarterly became a safe haven, could be overcome. The broader solidarity that Muhammad had begun to build was stabilized only after his death, and this was achieved, paradoxically, by some of the same people who had initially opposed him. In the next two years one of his most significant legacies became apparent: the willingness and ability of his closest supporters to sustain the ideal and the reality of one Muslim community under one leader, even in the face of significant opposition. When Muhammad died, two vital sources of his authority ended—ongoing revelation and his unique ability to exemplify his messages on a daily basis. A leader capable of keeping revelation alive might have had the best chance of inheriting his movement, but no Muslim claimed messengership, nor had Muhammad unequivocally designated any other type of successor. The anṣār, his early supporters in Medina, moved to elect their own leader, leaving the muhājirūn to choose theirs, but a small number of muhājirūn managed to impose one of their own over the whole. That man was Abū Bakr, one of Muhammad’s earliest followers and the father of his favourite wife, ʿĀʾishah. The title Abū Bakr took, khalīfah (caliph), meaning deputy or successor, echoed revealed references to those who assist major leaders and even God himself. To khalīfah he appended rasūl Allāh, so that his authority was based on his assistance to Muhammad as messenger of God.
Alecsey [184]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Mecca was connected to many global trade routes. After Muhammad's death, caliphs ensured the trade routes were safe and protected (Doc E #3). ... Mecca's important location as a center of trade allowed Islam to spread quickly to many distant lands

Muhammad’s continuing success gradually impinged on the Quraysh in Mecca. Some defected and joined his community. His marriage to a Quraysh woman provided him with a useful go-between. In 628 he and his followers tried to make an Islamized hajj but were forestalled by the Meccans. At Al-Ḥudaybiyah, outside Mecca, Muhammad granted a 10-year truce on the condition that the Meccans would allow a Muslim pilgrimage the next year. Even at this point, however, Muhammad’s control over his followers had its limits; his more zealous followers agreed to the pact only after much persuasion. As in all instances of charismatic leadership, persisting loyalty was correlated with continuing success. In the next year the Meccans allowed a Muslim hajj; and in the next, 630, the Muslims occupied Mecca without a struggle. Muhammad began to receive deputations from many parts of Arabia. By his death in 632 he was ruler of virtually all of it.

The Meccan Quraysh were allowed to become Muslims without shame. In fact, they quickly became assimilated to the actual muhājirūn, even though they had not emigrated to Yathrib themselves. Ironically, in defeat they had accomplished much more than they would have had they achieved victory: the centralization of all of Arabia around their polity and their shrine, the Kaʿbah, which had been emptied of its idols to be filled with an infinitely greater invisible power.

Because intergroup conflict was banned to all members of the ummah on the basis of their shared loyalty to the emissary of a single higher authority, the limitations of the Meccan concept of ḥaram, according to which the city quarterly became a safe haven, could be overcome. The broader solidarity that Muhammad had begun to build was stabilized only after his death, and this was achieved, paradoxically, by some of the same people who had initially opposed him. In the next two years one of his most significant legacies became apparent: the willingness and ability of his closest supporters to sustain the ideal and the reality of one Muslim community under one leader, even in the face of significant opposition. When Muhammad died, two vital sources of his authority ended—ongoing revelation and his unique ability to exemplify his messages on a daily basis. A leader capable of keeping revelation alive might have had the best chance of inheriting his movement, but no Muslim claimed messengership, nor had Muhammad unequivocally designated any other type of successor. The anṣār, his early supporters in Medina, moved to elect their own leader, leaving the muhājirūn to choose theirs, but a small number of muhājirūn managed to impose one of their own over the whole. That man was Abū Bakr, one of Muhammad’s earliest followers and the father of his favourite wife, ʿĀʾishah. The title Abū Bakr took, khalīfah (caliph), meaning deputy or successor, echoed revealed references to those who assist major leaders and even God himself. To khalīfah he appended rasūl Allāh, so that his authority was based on his assistance to Muhammad as messenger of God.

Explanation:

my brain hurts alot now!! thanks babe!

You might be interested in
The United States financed its efforts in World War II by
Artist 52 [7]
Definitely D
Hope I helped.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
50 POINTS
Andrews [41]

Answer:

<h2>It was the country of "Belgium" that exerted control over the present day Congo region by the 1800s, since it was clear to the Dutch that the Congo had large amounts of natural resources. </h2>

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which language is the most predominately spoken in the Middle East?​
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

Arabic

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what way did the Christian crusades contribute to the decline of the Byzantine Empire
mojhsa [17]
The crusades helped drive some of the seljuk Turks out of the area, but (according to Wikapedia) "It also opened up byzantium to Latin aggression which was not always dedicated to Byzantium's enemies"

Also, the Fourth crusade (made up of Latin crusaders) sacked Byzantium and greatly reduced power in the empire.
4 0
3 years ago
BEING TIMED! HELP! This political cartoon is from a California newspaper in the late 1800s.
snow_lady [41]
The conclusion that can be drawn is that Nativists opposed i migration from Asian nations. This can be seen from the stereotypical Asian features of the person being punched, and how a similar person is in a place named “China Town”.

Here are why the other reasons are incorrect:

American citizens never were targets of discrimination during this time, unless you count immigrants who became citizens (but not white American nationals), but this is not the answer and the cartoon does not illustrate Americans being discriminated against.

Though Americans opposed immigration from some European nations, the political cartoon is targeting Asian immigrants.

Finally, nativists did not focus on native Americans (mainly immigrants) and this cartoon did not target Native Americans. However, it’s likely that nativists at the time disliked native Americans. (But the cartoon isn’t about that).


Hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the result of “Bleeding Kansas”?
    7·2 answers
  • What part of the country did the dust bowl affect the most?
    9·2 answers
  • Was president Roosevelt advocating for neutrality or involvement?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these is a successful time management strategy? 
    12·1 answer
  • Why was it difficult for britain to govern america?
    9·1 answer
  • How was the railroad system different in the south than the north?
    7·1 answer
  • How would you describe President Carter’s personal style?
    6·2 answers
  • How did the United States and allies fight in Germany
    7·1 answer
  • How long are the terms for Representatives and Senators? What are the term limits for each?
    12·1 answer
  • what name was given to the territory set aside from for indigenous Americans displaced from their traditional lands
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!