Answer: a. Only one policy will pay, the premiums for the other contracts will be returned.
Explanation:
When there are multiple insurance contracts from the same insurer and these contracts have a ''Other Insurance With This Insurer'' provision, it means that in cases where the insured wants to claim, they can choose whichever of the policies they want and that one will pay out but they cannot pick them all.
The premiums paid on the other contracts/s will be returned to the insured because it represents excess coverage.
Answer:
$7,326
Explanation:
Double Decline Balance = 2 x SLDP x SLDBV
where,
SLDP = Straight Line Depreciation Percentage
= 100 ÷ useful life
= 100 ÷ 20
= 5 %
and
SLDBV = Straight Line Percentage Book Value
Year 1
Double Decline Balance = 2 x 5% x $81,400
= $8,140
Year 2
Double Decline Balance = 2 x 5% x ($81,400 - $8,140)
= $7,326
Therefore
The machine's second-year depreciation using the double-declining balance method is $7,326.
Answer:
The market value of equity should be used.
Explanation:
Their are only two methods which are book value method or market value method. The market value method is preferred because the reason is that the market value gives the more accurate numerical value that the securities of the company will give which is the required rate of return to its investors. However historic cost data is not useful because the value of stock and bonds keeps changing every second in the stock exchange and their is the risk that the WACC calculated is inaccurate which implies that the project appraised is also incorrect.
So the best way to calculate the weighted cost of capital is that we should use the fair value of the securities.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": B2B.
Explanation:
In a B2B business model goods or services are traded between two or more businesses. Most parts of these transactions are dedicated to the exchange of raw materials. Customers are part of the process only when the final product is offered in the open market but not during the B2B business process.
Answer:
Yes Gordon can sue Floors n' Mores for the settlement of the contract keeping in mind that Gordon has made partial completion of the contract. Full payment would be determined based on the completion of the total work in line withe the plans submitted when the contract was signed
Explanation:
In order to understand the scenario in case if Gordon wants to sue Floors n Mores they can only be compensated for the amount of project completion in line to the expectations that matches to Floors n More.
For Example if 75% of the work is in line with the expectation of Floors N More then Gordon should be paid total amount payable multiply by 75%.
Usually in such cases if the contract is fulfilled to certain extent it is preferred to close the contract based on the %age of completion because major reconstruction, buying of fixtures and furniture was executed. Hence major risks and rewards were transferred to Floors n Mores.
