Answer:
D). All of the above.
Explanation:
As per the question, all the given statements assert the outcomes of different court decisions of the years 1944, 1946, and 1948. In Smith Vs. Allwright case, the ap-ex court of the U.S. declared that the voters can not be outcasted from the voting rights by discriminating against them on the grounds of race. While in <u>Morgan Vs. Virginia case, the supreme court announced that it was unconstitutional(violation of the constitution) to segregate the riders on the basis of their race in interstate commercial buses</u>. And in the Shelly v. Kraemer case, the court declared the racially confining covenants to be the breach of the 14th amendment that declares 'equal protection to all its citizens regarding the rights of property, freedom, and life.' Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
Explanation:
Effectual Demand, can be explained as the demand followed up with at least just the right willingness to pay to bring the products or services demanded into the market.
Simply wanting a product is not enough to create an effectual demand for it because Effectual demand is shows the extent to which the income of the buyers, his perceptions and needs can be combined to result in an actual purchase and not just the mere desire to purchase.
<span>A map projection that shows accurate shape but a distorted size is called a mercator map. hope this helps</span>
The Tudor monarchs of 16th century England used the Court of the Star Chamber to "<span>C: raise and support military forces" since this was the body that was responsible for finances. </span>
