Several Japanese Americans were forced to leave their homes and families to go to internment camps since America was paranoid about Japanese spies.
Answer:
Explanation:
I looked it up to see what kind of a book it was and I read only the publisher's blub.
A: not a choice. I think you have to put it in the context of the 1870s or 80s. The author is little beyond that time. If it were me, I'd pick the falling in love answer. I like modern women's literature, not because it plays on the heartstrings (which it does) but because it presents women's grief and dilemma pretty honestly. But I think the 1870s especially dealing with a minority's grief would not chose this as a topic -- certainly not a serious one. So much as I would choose A, I doubt the novel would.
B: I don't think I'd choose B either. Victoriano sounds like an honorable man to me. He sympathizes with Clarence's problem and offers him a reasonable assurance that the women would not be present. From what we can gather, that turns out to be true. Clarence does not seem to have met anyone.
C: Trite though the detail is, it should happen.
D: I do not see Victoriano as the bad guy. I don't sense betrayal in him. I think I'll choose D as well.
E. I thought this already happened.
It shows the great levels of prejudice against immigrants. Even though there was no evidence showing that Sacco and Vanzetti murdered the man, the jury ordered them executed, reflective of the anti-immigrant sentiment.
Based on historical evidence, the scholar that relied heavily on the evidence about the substance of today's political debate is David M. Kennedy.
- This is evident in the fact that David M. Kennedy utilized the substantial fulfillment of the civil rights agenda in a political debate.
- The evidence he used was that the political system formulated to harmonize the varying societal differences such as abortion, gay rights, etc., is similar to the politicking of the nineteenth century.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that David M. Kennedy is the scholar that relied heavily on evidence about the substance of today's political debate.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/11409076
<span>Posteriormente fue nombrado Ministro de Relaciones Exteriores en el año 2006. Se le describió durante este tiempo como el "administrador y político más capacitado del círculo íntimo de Chávez"
Negativa: Maduro, como Chávez, ha sido acusado de liderazgo autoritario con medios convencionales que lo describen como un dictador, especialmente después de la suspensión del movimiento de retirada que se dirigía hacia él.</span>
(credit to Wiki)
