Speed in miles per hour is calculated as:
distance (in miles) ÷ time (in hours)
So we have:
(3/4) ÷ (3/10) = (3×10)/(4×3) = 30/12 = 15/6 = 5/2 = 2.5
So his speed is 2.5 mph (miles per hour).
Answer:
24°
Step-by-step explanation:
Complementary angles are the angles whose measurements equal to 90°
To find the complement of 66 you subtract it from 90
90 - 66 = 24
Answer:
39.0625%
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of a 25 inc TV screen is 300in²
The area of a 40 inch TV screen is 768in²
Percentage of area of the smaller screen to larger screen is;
300/768 × 100 = 39.0625%
Answer:
Check the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Algorithm for finding the new optimal flux: 1. Let E' be the edges eh E for which f(e)>O, and let G = (V,E). Find in Gi a path Pi from s to u and a path
, from v to t.
2) [Special case: If
, and
have some edge e in common, then Piu[(u,v)}uPx has a directed cycle containing (u,v). In this instance, the flow along this cycle can be reduced by a single unit without any need to change the size of the overall flow. Return the resulting flow.]
3) Reduce flow by one unit along 
4) Run Ford-Fulkerson with this sterling flow.
Justification and running time: Say the original flow has see F. Lees ignore the special case (4 After step (3) Of the elgorithuk we have a legal flaw that satisfies the new capacity constraint and has see F-1. Step (4). FOrd-Fueerson, then gives us the optimal flow under the new cePacie co mint. However. we know this flow is at most F, end thus Ford-Fulkerson runs for just one iteration. Since each of the steps is linear, the total running time is linear, that is, O(lVl + lEl).