I would actually say D.
With the industrial revolution, the amount of crops being produced actually wasn’t having too much work being put into producing those said crops. So it would actually encourage more people to become farmers because less work for more money is definitely something that most people would want to go for.
I hope this helps, have a great rest of your day!
Answer:
The legal action against McSween and the violence that followed was a result of the takeover of the Tunstall-McSweeny store and the killing of John Tunstall.
Explanation:
The legal action against McSween and the violence that followed was a result of the takeover of the Tunstall-McSweeny store and the killing of John Tunstall. During this time, Tunstall and McSween establish their companies in Lincoln county down the street to challenge the Dolan establishment which was dominating the area.
However, the Dolan store also known as House felt their establishment was illegal and againt thier business and he challenge them in court in a civil case. Dolan investment won the judgment to take over Tunstall-McSweeny stall which he did with the help sheriff posse and the court's writ to confiscate their properties. Tunstall was shot by the sheriff during a protest against the takeover of his ranch. In retaliation on Tunstall's death, Billy and Mcsweeny shot and killed the sheriff Brady and two of his deputies in an ambushed on Lincoln street.
Moreover, this fight continues which also lead to the death of Mcsweeny in 1878
You didn't list any choices, but some of the factors that might influence a person's political opinions include: <span>Media, Family, Friends, and Political Environment.</span>
Answer:
What does the fifth amendment protect?
The Fifth Amendment protects the right to avoid incriminating yourself. A defendant can plead the Fifth Amendment if a lawyer asks a question that the defendant would incriminate himself or herself by answering truthfully.
Explanation:
Constitutional Issue ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees that “no person . . . shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .” This right was made
part of the Bill of Rights to prevent a tyrannical government from forcing accused persons
to confess to crimes they may or may not have committed. Miranda’s case before the
Supreme Court was based on this Fifth Amendment protection. The Court accepted the
case in order to explore and clarify certain problems arising from earlier decisions related
to the rights of individuals taken into police custody. The precise question that the Court
explored was under what circumstances an interrogation may take place so that a confession made during the interrogation would be constitutionally admissible in a court of law.
★★★★★★★
