1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
love history [14]
3 years ago
12

According to historian Jacob Burchardt, was there a difference between the people of the Middle Ages and people of the Renaissan

ce
History
1 answer:
Bas_tet [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Building his typology of the Renaissance culture, Burkhardt turns to an important point - the problem of attitude to the supernatural. At a mental level, not controlled by the individual, namely faith determines general socio-psychological attitudes. This fact Burkhardt does not question and draws attention to its specific historical manifestations. At the center of the problem of interest in the interpretation of the scientist is the attitude of various peoples to higher subjects - to God, virtues and immortality.

Burkhardt fixes the specifics of the medieval mentality, in particular in Italy, quite clearly: the power of imagination, the socio-psychological settings of a particular individual, are directed to God. Moreover, the attitude towards the supernatural is positive, it does not contradict the everyday practice of spiritual being. So, the Middle Ages, recognizing God, i.e., faith in the divine leadership of the world, had Christianity as their source and support and the church as an expression of its external power.

In the late Middle Ages, the situation changes dramatically. A number of socio-economic and political circumstances change it to the opposite.  

First, there was a clear decline in those social structures that were previously responsible for the reproduction of the general attitude towards the supernatural, that is, towards God. The Institute of the Church was decaying. Burkhardt notes that it can theoretically be assumed that in such a situation, society can distinguish between the church as a social institution and Christianity itself and continue to uphold religion. However, the scientist points out, such attitudes are easier to formulate than to fulfill.  

By the time of the Renaissance, the attitude of the upper and middle Italian estates to the church as a social institution was composed of deep, complete contempt of indignation, of adaptation to the existing system of church hierarchy, as well as of a feeling of still existing traditional mental dependence on sacraments and blessings.

In such conditions, a new spiritual environment arose in Italy, the culture of the Renaissance flourished. Its base was humanism, which is based on a qualitatively different attitude to the supernatural and new mental manifestations accompanying such an attitude. An individual by the time of the Italian Renaissance was in constant spiritual tension or excitement. The spiritual vacuum was rapidly being filled with worldliness, arising primarily through an abundant influx of new views, thoughts and tasks regarding nature and human.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Find a story in the New Testament that speaks about the Kingdom of God Title of the story: _______________ Title of the book, ch
kobusy [5.1K]

Answer:

mark 1 ;14-15

Explanation:

started the time is fulfilled and the kingdom of God is at hand repent and believe in the gospel

it says in the Bible that in heaven that's going to be streets of gold Gates of pearl and that won't be weeping sadness you can't get hurt there

hope this helps:)

7 0
1 year ago
How are federal judges selected?
Otrada [13]

Candidates are nominated and appointed by the president if the Senate approves by a majority vote.

Good luck

6 0
3 years ago
Which situation is a result of the other two?
Sergio [31]

Answer:

what do you mean?

3 0
3 years ago
What were the Patriots’ advantages in the war? What were the Patriots’ disadvantages in the war? HELPPPPPPP
melamori03 [73]
Advantage:
They were fighting on their home country. (they didn't have to travel overseas)
Britain was fighting France at the same time as they were fighting the US

Disadvantage:
They didn't have a trained army.
They didn't have much $.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the terms of the agreement reached at the conference? during ww2 atlantic conference
Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

Among them, the United States and Britain agreed not to seek territorial gains from the war, and they opposed any territorial changes made against the wishes of the people concerned. The two countries also agreed to support the restoration of self-government to those nations who had lost it during the war.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Indian Act of 1924 gave American Indians the right of U.S. citizenship.
    9·1 answer
  • With the Compromise of 1850, the South gained
    9·2 answers
  • Look at the bowl from the Koryo dynasty.
    8·2 answers
  • What is the role of government in natural law
    10·1 answer
  • HELP A GIRL OUT!!!
    8·2 answers
  • What’s the most common presidential first name, shared by six men?
    14·1 answer
  • Who were the main opponents in the Punic Wars?
    10·2 answers
  • At one time, this private company was the world's largest and richest.
    7·1 answer
  • 4. The organism that is harmed in predation.​
    6·2 answers
  • 3. What is a system where all branches are balanced, so that each branch can check or limit the power of the other branches call
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!