1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
love history [14]
3 years ago
12

According to historian Jacob Burchardt, was there a difference between the people of the Middle Ages and people of the Renaissan

ce
History
1 answer:
Bas_tet [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Building his typology of the Renaissance culture, Burkhardt turns to an important point - the problem of attitude to the supernatural. At a mental level, not controlled by the individual, namely faith determines general socio-psychological attitudes. This fact Burkhardt does not question and draws attention to its specific historical manifestations. At the center of the problem of interest in the interpretation of the scientist is the attitude of various peoples to higher subjects - to God, virtues and immortality.

Burkhardt fixes the specifics of the medieval mentality, in particular in Italy, quite clearly: the power of imagination, the socio-psychological settings of a particular individual, are directed to God. Moreover, the attitude towards the supernatural is positive, it does not contradict the everyday practice of spiritual being. So, the Middle Ages, recognizing God, i.e., faith in the divine leadership of the world, had Christianity as their source and support and the church as an expression of its external power.

In the late Middle Ages, the situation changes dramatically. A number of socio-economic and political circumstances change it to the opposite.  

First, there was a clear decline in those social structures that were previously responsible for the reproduction of the general attitude towards the supernatural, that is, towards God. The Institute of the Church was decaying. Burkhardt notes that it can theoretically be assumed that in such a situation, society can distinguish between the church as a social institution and Christianity itself and continue to uphold religion. However, the scientist points out, such attitudes are easier to formulate than to fulfill.  

By the time of the Renaissance, the attitude of the upper and middle Italian estates to the church as a social institution was composed of deep, complete contempt of indignation, of adaptation to the existing system of church hierarchy, as well as of a feeling of still existing traditional mental dependence on sacraments and blessings.

In such conditions, a new spiritual environment arose in Italy, the culture of the Renaissance flourished. Its base was humanism, which is based on a qualitatively different attitude to the supernatural and new mental manifestations accompanying such an attitude. An individual by the time of the Italian Renaissance was in constant spiritual tension or excitement. The spiritual vacuum was rapidly being filled with worldliness, arising primarily through an abundant influx of new views, thoughts and tasks regarding nature and human.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who was the second president of the United States?​
Talja [164]

Answer:

John Adams

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
6. What did Britain do in response to the Great Depression?
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

Britain left the European Exchange Rate Mechanism.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A customer says that Betty cheated her out of $2,000 at Betty's store. The customer then
kirill115 [55]

Answer:

He would be violating her 7th amendment right, which is trial by jury.

Explanation:

Since he is not allowing her the right to a trial by jury he is violating her rights.

Hope this helps!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was it important to the plebeians to have Roman laws written down?
Masja [62]

Answer:

Patricians were small, but had power,People were against this because they were the smallest group and had lots of power which seemed unfair so laws were written down so that laws could not be changed whenever the patricians wanted.

4 0
3 years ago
What happened after the thirteen colonies became the thirteen states?
Olenka [21]
<span>After the colonies became states new laws had to be written and enforced. A whole government had to be created from the ground up. Officials had to be elected. A capital city had to be chosen so there was somewhere to have the government buildings in one place.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the Great Compromise and the Three-fifths Compromise both involved the issue of how
    11·1 answer
  • What is the reason that Americans buy Hawaii?
    9·1 answer
  • In the Chinese Civil War, the United States attempted to stop the spread of communism by sending billions of dollars in aid to t
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following problems plagued Great Britain during the early years of King George III’s reign? Select the correct answ
    6·2 answers
  • How did the use of electricity affect economic development in the United States
    15·1 answer
  • In what ways do Native American cultures reflect environmental influences ?
    7·1 answer
  • When did Harriet Tubman Die?
    6·1 answer
  • The supreme court ruling prohibiting further recounting of florida's votes and awarding the 2000 election to george w. bush was
    15·1 answer
  • Ipaliwanag ang suliraning kinakaharap ng katiwala​
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best summarizes the purpose of this article
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!