1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
love history [14]
3 years ago
12

According to historian Jacob Burchardt, was there a difference between the people of the Middle Ages and people of the Renaissan

ce
History
1 answer:
Bas_tet [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Building his typology of the Renaissance culture, Burkhardt turns to an important point - the problem of attitude to the supernatural. At a mental level, not controlled by the individual, namely faith determines general socio-psychological attitudes. This fact Burkhardt does not question and draws attention to its specific historical manifestations. At the center of the problem of interest in the interpretation of the scientist is the attitude of various peoples to higher subjects - to God, virtues and immortality.

Burkhardt fixes the specifics of the medieval mentality, in particular in Italy, quite clearly: the power of imagination, the socio-psychological settings of a particular individual, are directed to God. Moreover, the attitude towards the supernatural is positive, it does not contradict the everyday practice of spiritual being. So, the Middle Ages, recognizing God, i.e., faith in the divine leadership of the world, had Christianity as their source and support and the church as an expression of its external power.

In the late Middle Ages, the situation changes dramatically. A number of socio-economic and political circumstances change it to the opposite.  

First, there was a clear decline in those social structures that were previously responsible for the reproduction of the general attitude towards the supernatural, that is, towards God. The Institute of the Church was decaying. Burkhardt notes that it can theoretically be assumed that in such a situation, society can distinguish between the church as a social institution and Christianity itself and continue to uphold religion. However, the scientist points out, such attitudes are easier to formulate than to fulfill.  

By the time of the Renaissance, the attitude of the upper and middle Italian estates to the church as a social institution was composed of deep, complete contempt of indignation, of adaptation to the existing system of church hierarchy, as well as of a feeling of still existing traditional mental dependence on sacraments and blessings.

In such conditions, a new spiritual environment arose in Italy, the culture of the Renaissance flourished. Its base was humanism, which is based on a qualitatively different attitude to the supernatural and new mental manifestations accompanying such an attitude. An individual by the time of the Italian Renaissance was in constant spiritual tension or excitement. The spiritual vacuum was rapidly being filled with worldliness, arising primarily through an abundant influx of new views, thoughts and tasks regarding nature and human.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why was the development of the Bessemer process important to Great
Stells [14]

The Bessemer Process was an innovative way to produce steel.

  • Increased the quality of steel
  • Allowed for mass production
  • More construction of skyscrapers
4 0
2 years ago
Who said "now he belongs to the ages" edwin stanton
Ahat [919]

Answer:

U.S. Secretary of War

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements describe the Persian Empire?
salantis [7]

Answer:

b and d

Explanation:

a. The Persians fought the Greeks, but lost.

b. Darius I and many other Persian leaders treated their subjects well and were very powerful

c. Persia was fine with letting its subject choose their religion

d. true.

6 0
3 years ago
Chickens are the closest living relatives to the T-Rex
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

good to know lol

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Life for the average ancient Egyptian was carefree and easy. A. Yes. B. No
navik [9.2K]
The life of an average Egyptian in the ancient times was difficult. Most of them have devoted themselves to working in the agricultural realm <span>in which the work of plowing, planting and harvesting were still defined to be very difficult. They often work hard to exchange their crops to meat. Answer is No.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • An effect of the kansas nebraska act of 1854 was that
    8·2 answers
  • how did the domestication of livestock allow civilization to spread (peoples in the eastern mediterranean)
    15·1 answer
  • Activities of which Galileo Galilei and Sir Isaac Newton are most closely associated
    11·2 answers
  • Enter the word you received when you completed the balancing the scales of justice activity
    11·2 answers
  • What was NOT a consequence of the Protestant Reformation?
    8·2 answers
  • A) Explain the Reconstruction measures implemented by Radical Republicans in Congress in regards to these areas: Readmission of
    14·1 answer
  • Name one reason that the people of Russia were angry with the Czar
    5·1 answer
  • _______ in the North depended on cotton in order to produce textiles.
    14·2 answers
  • One of the purposes of the FEMA and the red cross is to?
    14·2 answers
  • Why were spaniards able to maintain control over the vast aztec empire? how did they unintentionally weaken the aztec empire?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!