That is true because that’s where it’s mostly are
Experiments with faulty design or inconsistent data:
-decreases the experiment's reliability and validity
- wastes time and resources
- destroys the scientist's credibility in their field
- may lead to issues of safety to the experimenter/s due to faulty design
- is discouraged especially in hard sciences where data obtained should be accurate and precise
Explanation:
There are many<span> reasons that experiments with faulty </span>styles<span> or with incorrect </span>knowledge are<span> problematic for scientists. One reason for them to be problematic </span>is that if<span> he or she were to poorly </span>live<span> what </span>they're learning<span>. </span>as an example<span>, </span>somebody<span> measured the mass of a book </span>properly<span> to be </span>two<span> pounds, and </span>somebody else<span> measured it </span>erroneously<span> to be </span>one<span> pound. </span>differently<span>, that faulty designed experiments and inconsistent </span>knowledge will be<span> problematic is lack of accuracy and </span><span>exactness.</span>
Answer: The primary function of leaves is to collect sunlight, for use in photosynthesis.
Hope this helped!!
Answer:
Explanation:
An element only has <u>one</u> type of atom and cannot be broken down by chemical means.
Let's analyze the answer choices.
1. This has two types of atoms, so it cannot be an element. It has more than one type of atom.
2. This has two types of atoms that are bonded together. It cannot be an element because there is more than one type of atom and the bonds can be broken.
3. This has one type of atoms, so it is an element.
Therefore the best answer choice is 3.
