Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.
Answer:
d. 10.6% higher
Explanation:
Given that;
Real GDP = $13.2 trillion
Nominal GDP = $14.6 trillion
GDP deflator = (Nominal GDP/Real GDP)× 100)
Hence,
GDP deflator = (14.6 / 13.2 ) × 100
GDP deflator = 110.6%
Thus,
= 110.6 - 100
= 10.6% higher
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
In an interview for a job, there is no specific rule to be followed that an interviewee must follow. An interview is a perfect time to get to know more about the company's needs and also to advertise yourself.
But in case the job is no something that you like, then you must call the interviewer back and thank them for their time and also tell them the reason for the job rejection. Moreover, it is unethical to abruptly decline any job offer. Also, rejecting a job during the interview is not a standard procedure, for it will only make you seem more unethical and disrespectful.
Therefore, <u>it is not true that rejecting a job on the spot during an interview is a standard procedure.</u>
Answer:
Direct material price variance= $5,000 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Standard cost per unit 3 pounds at $2 per unit
Actual cost per unit 2.5 pounds at $3 per unit
During the month, 5,000 pounds of raw materials were purchased.
<u>To calculate the direct material price variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Direct material price variance= (standard price - actual price)*actual quantity
Direct material price variance= (2 - 3)*5,000
Direct material price variance= $5,000 unfavorable
