Answer:
The question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
a) Suggest to Patrice that spreading negative information learned from eavesdropping is not healthy for the workplace.
b) Thank Patrice for speaking up and forward the item to a neutral third party for handling.
c) Immediately fire the team members who made the comments.
d) Contact the team member who was the subject of the comments to see if he or she was offended.
e) Thank Patrice for her input, but based on the harmlessness of the situation, take no further action.
And the correct answer is the option B: Thank Patrice for speaking up and forward the item to a neutral third party for handling.
Explanation:
To begin with, these kind of situations are most common than expected in the workplace so that is why that nowadays exist a lot of seminars about certain subjects that involves the behavior in the organization and furthermore there is the regular action of the Human Resources Department that takes cares of all the penalties and the solutions when it comes to subjects regarding the employees of the business and their relationship both with each other and with the company. So the correct way to act in this scenario would be to thank Patrice and tell her that the manager would inform to the Human Resources Department about it, being this last one a third party in the situation itself.
Technology is a growing part of the US economy.
The four largest manufacturing industries in America are computers and electronics; chemicals; food, beverages, and tobacco; petroleum and coal—account for about 51 percent of manufacturing GDP. The top nine sectors constitute approximately 79 percent of manufacturing GDP. These sectors accounted for 68 percent of total manufacturing employment in 2010.
From the above graph, we can see clearly that the technology sector had increased from $225billion in 2006 to about $360billion in 2011, which is about a 60% increase in a span of 5 years, thats a massive growth within a short period.
Answer:
d. the supply curve of new houses would shift rightward, since builders would be willing to produce and sell more houses at each given price.
Place more oil on the market this year, shifting the curve rightward.
Explanation:
1. In the given scenario the government is willing to give home-construction companies $10,000 for every house that they build.
This will result in more willingness on the part of the construction companies to build more houses.
More houses built means more income coming in from the government.
Therefore the supply curve of home building will shift to the right.
2. When oil producers expect prices of oil to increase in the next year, there is a need to control oil prices by increasing availability of oil in the market.
Increase in price results from a scarcity of oil. So to mitigate this excess oil is supplied to control price increase.
This action will shift the curve rightward.
