1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BabaBlast [244]
2 years ago
6

What body of law governs mixed contracts dealing with the sale of both goods and services. Does the UCC Article 2 apply to such

mixed contracts? Why/why not?
Law
1 answer:
Airida [17]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

If i am wrong sorry

Explanation:

Common law governs contracts for services as well as contracts not otherwise governed by the UCC. It is important to recognize the elements of common-law contract formation because they are more stringent than the requirements for formation between merchants under the UCC.

You might be interested in
The Virginian General assembly passes constitutional legislation who ratifies it
Triss [41]

Constitution of Virginia

ADD ARTICLE DESCRIPTION

The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia is the document that defines and limits the powers of the state government and the basic rights of the citizens of the U.S. Commonwealth of Virginia. Like all other state constitutions, it is supreme over Virginia's laws and acts of government, though it may be superseded by the United States Constitution and U.S. federal law as per the Supremacy Clause.

The Virginia Constitutional Convention, 1830, by George Catlin

The original Virginia Constitution of 1776 was enacted at the time of the Declaration of Independence by the first thirteen states of the United States of America. Virginia was an early state to adopt its own Constitution on June 29, 1776, and the document was widely influential both in the United States and abroad. In addition to frequent amendments, there have been six major subsequent revisions of the constitution (by Conventions for the constitutions of 1830, 1851, 1864, 1870, 1902, and by commission for 1971 amendments). These new constitutions have been part of, and in reaction to, periods of major regional or social upheaval in Virginia. For instance, the 1902 constitution included provisions to disenfranchise African Americans, who in 1900 made up nearly 36% of the state's population. They did not regain suffrage until after passage of federal civil rights legislation in the mid-1960s.

Historic constitutions

See also: Virginia Conventions

George Mason, one of the principal architects of the 1776 Virginia Constitution

1776

The preparation of the first Virginia Constitution began in early 1776, in the midst of the early events of the American Revolution. Among those who drafted the 1776 Constitution were George Mason and James Madison. Thomas Jefferson was Virginia's representative to the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia at the time, and his drafts of the Virginia constitution arrived too late to be incorporated into the final document. James Madison's work on the Virginia Constitution helped him develop the ideas and skills that he would later use as one of the main architects of the United States Constitution.

The 1776 Constitution declared the dissolution of the rule of Great Britain over Virginia and accused England's King George III of establishing a "detestable and insupportable tyranny". It also established separation of governmental powers, with the creation of the bicameral Virginia General Assembly as the legislative body of the state and the Governor of Virginia as the "chief magistrate" or executive. The accompanying Virginia Declaration of Rights, written primarily by Mason, focuses on guarantees of basic human rights and freedoms and the fundamental purpose of government. It, in turn, served as a model for a number of other historic documents, including the United States Bill of Rights.

Critically, the 1776 Constitution limited the right to vote primarily to property owners and men of wealth. This effectively concentrated power in the hands of the landowners and aristocracy of Southeastern Virginia. Dissatisfaction with this power structure would come to dominate Virginia's constitutional debate for almost a century.

1830 Virginia Constitution, page one

1830

By the 1820s, Virginia was one of only two states that limited voting to landowners. In addition, because representation was by county rather than population, the residents of increasingly populous Western Virginia (the area that would become West Virginia in 1863) had grown discontented at their limited representation in the legislature. Pressure increased until a constitutional convention was convened in 1829–1830. This convention became largely a contest between eastern Virginia planters of the slaveholding elite and the less affluent yeomen farmers of Western Virginia. Issues of representation and suffrage dominated the debate. Delegates to the convention included such prominent Virginians as James Madison, James Monroe, John Tyler, and John Marshall.

The convention ultimately compromised by loosening suffrage requirements. It also reduced the number of delegates and senators to the Virginia General Assembly. The resulting constitution was ratified by a popular majority, though most of the voters in the western part of the state ended up voting against it. Thus, the underlying intrastate tensions remained, and would have to be addressed later.

Hope it helps you. ............... ...........................

6 0
3 years ago
What is the importance of hair in the successful investigation of murder, assault and etc.​
Crank

Answer:

Obtaining palynological and other botanical evidence from murder victims is becoming part of routine mortuary protocol in the United Kingdom. Forensic pathologists are often keen to cooperate in the collection of classes of material that have, in the past, been considered to be of little importance in criminal investigation. Work over the last eight years has demonstrated the great value in scrutinising cadavers for the presence of plant material and/or soil stains. Macroscopic plant remains and palynomorphs (pollen, spores and other microscopic entities) retrieved from skin and hair have allowed the differentiation of murder scenes from places of eventual deposition. Furthermore, although the opportunity has not yet presented itself, obtaining palynological evidence from the hair of suspects is feasible. During an offence, the offender might have had physical contact with foliage or the ground. Pollen and spore assemblages picked up by hair during that activity might provide forensic evidence for contact. Brief details of some aspects of case histories are presented to demonstrate the value of sampling cadavers. One case has been through the courts while the other is ongoing and, therefore, cannot be identified

5 0
3 years ago
Https://youtu.be/eQqaEM1df_A <br>when I'll get 1k subscribers​
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

okokokokokokokokokokokokok

Explanation:

yes

8 0
3 years ago
small loan rates of interest (like credit cards) are normally exceeding the state usurious rates, but are allowed due to the hig
emmainna [20.7K]

Answer: true

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Assume that you believe you have suffered a legally-recognizable wrong. You are considering filing a lawsuit.
Sophie [7]

Answer:

Check explanation

Explanation:

Filing a lawsuit simply means that you, as a plaintiff are taking a case to court to demand remedy for the cause of action of the the second party, the defendant.

Oh yes, we all want retribution against someone that hurt us but in the real sense, deciding to file a lawsuit is not easy because there are lot of emotions that are put into it. Nonetheless, if I am to file a lawsuit, there are certain factors I am going to consider. Few of them are enumerated below;

===>The first factor I am going to consider is FINANCE or money. In order to file a lawsuit one has to pay court dues for it, in addition to the cost of getting a lawyer or an Attorney. I am going to sit down and ask myself, ''what if the Lawsuit Cost More than what the case Worth?'

===>The second thing I am going to consider is MY CHANCE OF WINNING. Do I have evidence, or do I really have a case? These are some of the thoughts that will be going through my mind. So, I have to consider how likely am I going to win the case.

===>The third thing I am going to consider is TIME. court cases do take time, so I have to consider this too.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What should I do today
    7·1 answer
  • Please need help with this one
    15·1 answer
  • The additional standard for age 65 and older or blind
    8·1 answer
  • Someone please help!!!!<br><br>What is the supreme law of the land?<br>​
    15·1 answer
  • Suppose the Federal Reserve decides to increase the money supply. Which statement predicts the most likely effect?
    14·2 answers
  • The American Bar Association prohibits lawyers from considering the nature of their own reputations when setting legal fees for
    8·1 answer
  • . Bills may be introduced in each house (also called a chamber) of Congress only by
    8·1 answer
  • Which side supports military spending.
    5·2 answers
  • 4. If you're stressed while driving, you should NOT:
    14·1 answer
  • What is article 5 of the constitution mainly about.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!