1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
avanturin [10]
3 years ago
15

What does PAR stand for?

Law
2 answers:
muminat3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

c. Phillipine area of responsibility.

Explanation:

PAR stands for Phillipine area of responsibility.

marysya [2.9K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following cases established testimony by expert witness?
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

Explanation:

Judge is the gatekeeper

The judge is to decide whether the expert is qualified to deliver reliable testimony and whether the expert's report is sufficiently reliable to be helpful to the Trier of Fact.

Rule 702 Testimony by Experts

1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data

2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods.

The Supreme Court identified four tests that can be used by the gatekeeper-judge to determine whether to admit the expert testimony. It is typically understood that it is not necessary for the expert testimony to pass all four tests.

1) Tested - Whether the theory or technique used by the expert can be, and has been, tested

2) Peer Review - Whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication

3) Error Rate - The known or potential rate of error of the method used is known or predictable

4) General Acceptance - The degree of the method's or conclusion's acceptance within the relevant scientific community

Review of five court cases

1) Frye v. United States - 1923 - established the "general acceptance" principle

2) Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 702 - 1975 - established the rule for "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" expert witness testimony

3) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals - 1993 - established the four-part Daubert test for evaluating expert testimony

4) GE v. Joiner - 1997 - confirmed the trial judge's gatekeeper role

5) Kumho Tire v. Carmichael - 1999 - expanded the Daubert tests to apply to all disciplines

United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land

A good example of the application of the Daubert Test.

This is a rare case where the appellate court overruled the trial judge's gatekeeper role.

Gatekeeper is not intended to serve as a replacement for the adversary system: Vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.

Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. In other words, the purpose is to make the process more efficient.

The report must contain:

(i) a complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them;

(ii) the data or other information considered by the witness in forming them;

(iii) any exhibits that will be used to summarize or support them;

(iv) the witness's qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(v) a list of all other cases in which, during the previous 4 years, the witness testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(vi) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony in the case.

That written report must contain, at a minimum, six items:

1) All opinions the witness will express and their foundation and reasoning;

2) Data and information considered by the witness;

3) Any exhibits that will be used while giving the testimony in court;

4) Witness qualifications, including all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

5) List of all other cases in the last four years where testimony was given as an expert at trial or deposition;

6) Description of the compensation for the study and testimony.

An appraisal report may need to be quite detailed. This may be at odds with the request of retaining counsel, who may want a less detailed report.

Report should include any exhibits which the witness anticipates using as "demonstrative evidence" during testimony.

report should include a statement of publications and testimony for the prescribed periods.

Some items of interest in this Rule are:

1 - If an objection is raised by one of the attorneys, the deponent will still be required to provide an answer, but that answer will be subject to approval by the court after hearing the objection.

2 - The deponent may refuse to answer a question only when it is necessary to preserve a privilege, enforce a limitation directly by the court, or present a motion under Rule 30(d)(4).

3 - The maximum time limit for a deposition is one day of seven hours.

4 - The deponent has the right to review and correct the transcript. He or she will have 30 days after receiving the transcript to review and submit corrections. However, this right must be affirmed and requested during the deposition. It is recommended that the appraiser expert always request this right to review and correct, as it will provide the appraiser with a copy of the transcript of the "oral report" for his or her workfile.

Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

The time limit to respond is 30 days from the date of service of the interrogatories.

6 0
3 years ago
An offer of a reward for the arrest and conviction of a criminal is an example of a: a. ​ ​unilateral contract. b. ​ ​formal con
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

a. unilateral contract

Explanation:

Unilateral contract -

It refers to as the agreement between two parties or individual , where the offeror agrees to pay as soon as the specified act is completed , is referred to as unilateral contract .  

The contract is used for an open request .

For example ,

insurance policy contract , is partially unilateral in nature .

Hence , from the given information of the question ,

The correct option is a. unilateral contact .

3 0
3 years ago
Yo what is (6x9)+(6+9) pls answer it will make your day NICER.
Serga [27]

Answer:

the answer is 89

Explanation:

6×9=74

6+9=15

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1) What are some potential problems or risks of relying on the information provided by anonymous 9-1-1 callers to serve as proof
Bess [88]

Answer:

People like to call in and request to be anonymous because they know they are being nosy, or dramatic about a situation. Not always the reason though. But anonymous calls tend to have wrong information in them and can sometimes be completely false, and a way for one person to just try and get someone else in trouble. The problem with that is, you can't do a follow up depending on your department policy. Unless there is some sort of evidence, the person can't be charged, and by not having an available witness, it basically just makes the call a checkup to make sure no one is doing anything wrong.

No, unless a truly barbaric crime has occured, there should be no follow up. The caller wanted to be anonymous, so let them be anonymous unless they decide to come forward with more information.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What level of government is in charge of regulating teacher licenses?​
zheka24 [161]

Answer:

State governments

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What kind of crime is it when a person commits a crime, goes on trial and is sentenced to 2 years in prison?
    10·1 answer
  • According to Merton's strain theory, individual's living in environments of social strain will adapt in one of 5 ways.
    8·1 answer
  • Mike lives in a country in which the government owns all the property and controls all the natural resources; he likely lives in
    15·2 answers
  • Write three sentences contrasting the Federalist and Anti-Federalist viewpoints on separation of powers in the Constitution.
    14·2 answers
  • Without paying interest for a late bill, if the $5,543 has to be paid in 12 payments over the next year, how much will they need
    8·1 answer
  • How many members are in each chamber of Arizona's legislature?
    8·1 answer
  • If a cop pulls u over can they arrest you right away for crashing and speeding
    15·2 answers
  • Describe one factor that increases the likelihood for the supreme court to accept an appeal.
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements most accurately describes the Supreme Court's rational for the decision in McDonald v. Chicago
    9·1 answer
  • Phoenix was found guilty as charged; however, the judge deferred imprisonment and stipulated court supervision and demonstration
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!