Answer:
The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.
The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.
It states, for instance, that
<em>"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
</em>
- <em>
protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety
</em>
- <em>prevent disorder or crime
</em>
- <em>protect health or morals
</em>
- <em>protect the rights and reputations of other people
</em>
- <em>prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence
</em>
- <em>maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"</em>
Cheers!
Answer:
At a high level, public safety involves protecting the public safeguarding people from crimes, disaster, and other potential dangers and threats. In the United States, public safety is the dedicated responsibility of certain government organizations and local departments.
b
First off answer D is logical but is expected however just by remaining calm doesn’t mean you’ll handle the situation so in order to actually handle a situation you call 911 obviously. Trick question, completely unspecified.
Answer:In a bid to end violence against women, the Ministry of Human Rights (MOHR) Pakistan on Thursday launched a free, nationwide helpline to ...
Answer:
The answer to this question is C. rehabilitation.
