He believed and suggested that Germans should have the treaty of Versailles reversed and that they should not be punished as harsh as they were for world war 1 and that they should once again become a strong and a proud country that they were before world war 1. This resonated well with the people who supported this, however, he saw the path to this greatness through war and genocide and attacking everyone in Europe.
A. Government provides services that would not be practical for private business
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Arthur Young states that there is a great difference between the “lower people” in England and France. Who does he blame for that difference?
He blamed the government of France. Why? Because it oppressed the French people and forced them to pay heavy taxation. That is why the woman had a sad wrinkled face that reflected pain and desperation.
The life of the woman Arthur Young met was of poverty, suffering, pain, and despair. She was a very poor woman like many French people from the Third State. In comparison, the lives of Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette, and other members of the First and Second Estates were full of unnecessary luxuries and flamboyant styles, when the people of France were starving. That is why the French Revolution started, for the many injustices and poverty, while the French crown lived a luxurious life.
The MOST likely reason Puritans decided to establish the Massachusetts Bay Colony in <em>1620</em> was because of "religious freedom."
This is evident the first governor of Massachusetts Bay Colony, John Winthrop, claimed that the group of Protestants was settling on "a city upon a hill,” which was considered a new English Israel.
The Puritan groups would later settle in other areas such as New Haven Colony, the Connecticut Colony, and Rhode Island.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. "Religious freedom."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/3970160
In 1830, they took the state of Georgia to court in a case that challenged Georgia's jurisdictional claims directly. In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, the Cherokees sought an injunction against Georgia's attempts to implement its act of 1828 asserting sovereignty over Cherokee lands.