#2 5.88 #3 6.510 #4 7.578 #5 9.835 #6 11.910 #7 3.72
Jaime is incorrect, the angle does not depend on the radius of the circles.
<h3>Is Jaime correct?</h3>
Remember that an angle that defines an arc on a circle, does not depend on the radius of the circle.
So, if we have an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 3 inches and an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 6 inches, these two angles are exactly the same thing.
The radius of the circle only has an impact on the length of the arc defined by the angle.
So Jaime is clearly incorrect.
If you want to learn more about angles:
brainly.com/question/17972372
#SPJ1
Answer:
58
Step-by-step explanation:
because it is
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given that the Rumpart family is building a new room onto their house. The width of the new room will be 16 feet.
The length of the room will be 4% greater than the width. This means that length of new room will be 16 feet plus 4% of 16.
Therefore, the expression 
represents the length of new room and the length of new room is 16.64 feet.
Since we know that area of a rectangular shape is width times length.
Therefore, the area of the new room will be 266.24 square feet.
Answer: C. 5
Because (x^(2/3))(x^(3/3))=x^(5/3)
