State their claim and try to convince the reader
1. B) given
2. A) take. This one is a bit tricky, because if only "taked" was underlined, the correct version would be 'taken'. But if "have taked" is underlined, 'take' would work the same as 'have taken'.
<span>The point of view London uses in "The Call of the Wild" is the third person limited omniscient.
</span> Omniscient means that the narrator has access to character's thoughts and feelings
Buck’s point of view, for the most part; because London focuses on the character of Buck. He explains the <span>the dog's thoughts and feelings.</span> <span>
the novel also shifts briefly into </span>John Thornton’s point of view during his wager involving Buck’s ability to pull a heavy sled
I don’t think so, it’s not really comparing anything
Answer:For example, when you get those weird chewy caramel things on Halloween; given out of kindness but really no good. I'm thinking of something that is a "false gift", almost like the inverse of a blessing in disguise (which this thread discusses, but none of those are what I'm thinking of).
The intentionality of the giver is not so important as the properties of the thing itself: it is supposed to be good, but really isn't.
Explanation:
