Answer:
Religions and past beliefs systems have mostly been a disrupting element for development in India, the Middle East, and post-colonial Africa.
Explanation:
The reason is mainly because in these areas of the world, diverging religions and past belief systems were lumped together in the country borders that former European colonial empires devised.
For example, in India, the British unified Muslims with Hindus and other Indian religions, but social conflict soon proved to be too disrupting, and this led to the separation of India and Pakistan.
In Syria, Christians, Sunni Muslims, and Shia Muslims were forced to live in the same country by the French. To this day, Syria keeps essentially the same borders, and the Syrian Civil War (still ongoing) is a testament to the problems that people of different religions and belief systems living together in the same space can cause to a country or region.
The effect of the Congress of Vienna on the development of nationalism is that it has negative effects because the Congress had created political boundaries that ignored national groups instead placing these groups under the control of large empires. The powers in the Congress of Vienna in 1815 were afraid to the spread of nationalism spread by Napoleon.
The North had certain advantages. (1) More than twice as many people lived in the
North as in the South - 22 million in the North and 9 million in the South. Of the 9 million
people in the South, two out of every five were blacks, most of whom were slaves.
Slaves were not expected to fight. The slaves, however, might do the work at home and
thus release white men to join the army. (2) Not only did the North have more people,
but it had more resources and supplies. Most of the factories which could make guns,
ammunition, uniforms, and the thousands of articles needed in war, were in the North.
The North had more railroads to move goods and more men to do the fighting. It also
had more shipping. (3) Furthermore, the United States government, its army, and its
navy were already established and working. The South had to build these things as it
went along.
On the other hand, the South possessed certain advantages over the North. (1) For
one thing, the South was fighting for the most part on its own soil. Men fight harder
when they are defending their homes than when they are invading enemy territory. Also,
they know the territory much better than the invaders possibly could. (2) In addition, the
South had many outstanding military leaders who had resigned from the United States
Army to fight for the Confederacy. Among these men was Robert E. Lee. Although Lee
belonged to an old southern family, he did not believe in slavery and had already freed
his slaves. Lee was also against secession and opposed to the war. But he could not
bring himself to bear arms against his beloved state, Virginia. When that state seceded,
therefore, Lee cast his lot with the Confederacy. Thus the South gained a brilliant
general – the ablest and most thoroughly experienced in the whole United States Army.
Archival research &a Oral history are two ways.
Answer: A federal government is one in which the powers of government are divided between a central government and several local governments. An authority superior to both the central and local governments make this division of powers on a geographic basis, which cannot be changed by either the local or national level alone.
Explanation:
