All categories

2 years ago

Who was peter the great

History

1 answer:

mixer [17]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Peter the Great

Former Emperor of all the Russias

Thumbnail image

Peter the Great, Peter I or Pyotr Alekséyevich ruled the Tsardom of Russia and later the Russian Empire from 7 May [O.S. 27 April] 1682 until his death in 1725, jointly ruling before 1696 with his elder ... Wikipedia

Born: 9 June 1672, Moscow, Russia

Died: 8 February 1725, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Height: 2.03 m

Full name: Peter Alekseyevich Romanov

Buried: 1725, Peter and Paul Cathedral, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Children: Elizaveta Petrovna, Alexei Petrovich, Tsarevich of Russia, more

Explanation:

I hope it helps you btw Can I get a brainliests please ☺️

You might be interested in

PLZ HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Murrr4er [49]

C), but I'm not sure.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2.) Why was it easy for Britain to transport coal compared to other nations? *

pshichka [43]

Answer:

Britain had the first train system, which gave them the best advantage in transporting coal

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

ReadWorks

vova2212 [387]

C Victoria was born in 1819

4 0

2 years ago

Does the history of the American Revolution prove that owning small firearms is a way for citizens to defend themselves against

Yakvenalex [24]

The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.

<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>

Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.

Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.

They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.

Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.

#SPJ1

7 0

1 year ago

What was one difference between geographic expansion in New England and in the Chesapeake region?

vampirchik [111]

<u>Difference between geographic expansion in New England and in the Chesapeake region:</u>

<u>New England:</u>

New Englanders as a result of rough soil had constrained cultivating so they needed to go to timber, hide, and angling.

Homesteaders in the New England settlements suffered harshly cool winters and mellow summers.

The land was level near the coastline yet turned out to be bumpy and rugged more remote inland.

The dirt was commonly rough, making cultivating troublesome.

<u> Chesapeake region:</u>

The Chesapeake district was, be that as it may, extremely wealthy in soil, and cultivating turned into the primary concern.

Tobacco, indigo, and rice were the central yields.

Religion in the Chesapeake district was not in any manner normal, with the exception of in a couple of zones.

The reaction expresses that pioneers in the Chesapeake were increasingly "socialized" with the Indians.

The province of Maryland was expected as an asylum for Catholics in the wake of being abused when the Catholic Church isolated from the Church of England.

3 0

3 years ago