Answer:
e. All of the above
Explanation:
All options are possible certainly. The unions have the right to ask the employees to participate with the expectation that entitlement may follow from the study results. The study results are certainly going to ensure entitlement. Also, the employer might encourage or deny the participation of the workers as this is management work. It is on the employer that he allows or denies the employee from taking part in the meeting. Also, the employee might be pressurized by the management to take part in the study as the employer perceives the study are advantageous to the organization. This is a certainty as well, an employer might see profit in this. And the studies will affect the employee's pay, benefits as well as the promotion potential. The meeting is certainly going to increase employee's pay as well as provide him various benefits, and there are chances of promotion as well. Hence, all the options are correct.
The answer is B hope this helps
Answer:
increase the quality of team problem solving
Explanation:
In simple words, the ERG idea to develop a new dimension for more efficiency in the company is a clear evidence that the company and the team can now solve their problems more effectively.
The given case relates to the benefits of having diversity in the organisation with respect to culture, gender and age etc. It makes a more comfortable safe zone within where new ideas come everyday.
Answer:
binomial nomenclature
Explanation:
You can just look it up to prove that it is right
The (D) Robinson-Patman act makes it a crime for a seller to sell at lower prices in one geographic area than elsewhere in the United States to eliminate competition or a competitor.
<h3>
What is the Robinson-Patman act?</h3>
- The Robinson-Patman Act is a federal statute that was created in 1936 to make pricing discrimination illegal.
- The Robinson-Patman Act amends the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 in order to prohibit "unfair" competition.
- The Robinson-Patman Act is a federal statute that prohibits pricing discrimination.
- The law prohibits wholesalers from charging varying pricing to different merchants.
- The act only applies to interstate commerce and includes an exemption for "cooperative associations."
- Economists and legal scholars have strongly opposed the measure on a variety of grounds.
Therefore, the (D) Robinson-Patman act makes it a crime for a seller to sell at lower prices in one geographic area than elsewhere in the United States to eliminate competition or a competitor.
Know more about Robinson-Patman act here:
brainly.com/question/15587574
#SPJ4
Complete question:
The __________ makes it a crime for a seller to sell at lower prices in one geographic area than elsewhere in the United States to eliminate competition or a competitor.
Multiple Choice
(A) Federal Trade Commission Act
(B) Wheeler-Lea amendment
(C) Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act
(D) Robinson-Patman act
(E) Free Exercise Act
