Well they would generally be fed coarse corn meal boiled, which they referred to as mush. What they were fed was enough to sustain grown men and women through their backbreaking labors in the field.
This what by any means considered a luxury meal and they often grew their own crops and stole just to get a good meal. I believe they were treated that way as a means of showing them how minuscule they were, how they were the equivalent of pigs. A way to establish where they stood and where their master stood, a way to oppress and subjugate them.
Your question has been heard loud and clear.
For all these expressions , they are not complete sentences. They dont make too much of a sense.
They are called phrases (grammatical name).
Thank you.
The adjective form is 'helpful' if used positively and 'helpless' if used negatively
Answer:
An argument can be made for all of the following EXCEPT:
The speaker is not the poet.
Explanation:
In every poem, the speaker is the voice behind the poem or the narrator of the story. The speaker is created by the poet to voice out the poem. Therefore, the speaker is always treated as a fictional creation. The speaker always chooses a point of view to tell the story. The role of the speaker cannot be denied in a poem. Without the speaker's voice, the story may sound passive and unenjoyable. But the speaker imbues the story with some life, using an active voice.
