1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maurinko [17]
3 years ago
15

I need someone to write an objective summary about the story “after twenty years.” By O.Henry.

English
1 answer:
LenaWriter [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: The story begins with a beat cop walking down a New York City street on a rainy, windy night. The cop projects a sense of strength and rectitude, and takes his rounds very seriously, trying all the doors of the shops as he passes them to ensure that they are locked and secured for the evening. When he sees a man standing near one of the closed stores, he approaches, and the man begins to explain his presence, telling him that he is waiting for an old friend. Twenty years before, he and his friend made a pact to meet at that site. He acknowledges that it’s a pretty odd place to meet, explaining that twenty years before it was a restaurant owned by a man named Big Joe Brady. The cop tells him that the restaurant closed down about five years before. The man, who is wearing a very large jewel as a tie pin, goes on to tell the cop that twenty years before he met his friend Jimmy Wells there. They were best friends and had grown up in New York City. He describes them as almost like brothers. The day after their dinner the man was scheduled to begin a trip out West to seek his fortune, but Jimmy believed the best place for him to be was New York, and opted to stay behind. They then made their agreement to meet on the same spot in twenty years, because they were each confident of having achieved great things in that time. The cop finds himself interested in the story, and asks if they stayed in touch during that time. The man admits that they tried to and wrote each other for a little while, but stopped after a few years. He moved around too much to keep up a correspondence. Despite this gap in their communication, the man is confident that Jimmy will meet him as promised, because Jimmy was an extremely reliable person. He tells the cop that he traveled a very long way to be there, but will consider it worth it if he gets to see his friend again. He checks the time on an expensive watch and notes that it is three minutes to ten, and ten o’clock was when they said goodbye twenty years before. The cop, noting the jewel and the watch, suggests that the man was very successful out West, and the man enthusiastically confirms this. He expresses hope that Jimmy has done just as well for himself, but he notes that Jimmy was a ‛slow mover’ and is worried he may not have made his way very far in New York City. The cop makes to leave, and offers his hope that Jimmy shows up. He asks if the man will leave if Jimmy doesn’t make it by ten o’clock. The man says he’ll wait at least an additional half hour, because he has total faith that if Jimmy is alive he will make the appointment. The cop accepts this and leaves.The rain gets heavier, and the man waits. After about twenty minutes, a tall man appears wearing a long coat and hurries over. He asks if the man’s name if Bob, but sounds doubtful. The man says it is, and asks if it’s Jimmy Wells. He is, and they shake. Jimmy expresses a wish that the old restaurant was still there so they could have one more dinner in it, and then asks if Bob’s time out West was good to him. Bob assures him that it has been. Bob then notes that Jimmy seems to be taller than he used to be, and Jimmy assures him that he grew a little after he left. Bob asks if Jimmy’s doing well, and Jimmy says he is, and that he works for the city. Jimmy suggests they go to a place he knows so they can talk. Bob and Jimmy begin to walk, arm in arm. Bob tells Jimmy the story of his life, and Jimmy listens, obviously interested. When they reach a corner and stand under a streetlight, however, Bob pulls away and declares that the other man is not Jimmy Wells.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Part A: Select an Appropriate Interviewee
saul85 [17]

To answer this question, I will summarize it thus:

Part A: The older family member chosen is an aunt.

Part B: Some questions to ask:

  • Tell us about your childhood days.
  • Were you maltreated when growing up?
  • How did you cope among the boys in the family as the only female?
  • How did your parents treat you as the only of the house?
  • How did you relate with the opposite gender in school?

<h3>Who is interviewee?</h3>

An interviewee is actually known to be one who is being interviewed by an interviewer. The interviewee actually sits down and answers questions an interviewer throws at him or her.

We can see the above questions that one can ask the interviewee.

Learn more about interview on brainly.com/question/8846894

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For all the people that has read “there will come soft rains” I need help with the 1st question
Harman [31]
I think it is D. I think that it once had a religious meaning , but even though times had changed and God was no longer part of the church. —- it remained the same
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Shakespeare day, an alternative title for the merchant of Venice was the Jew of Venice, which title do you think is more appr
nadezda [96]

Answer:

Merchant of Venice is more appropriate because even during Shakespeare's time, because of the similar plot to the Jew of Malta, Shakespeare named the play as Merchant of Venice so that there won't be any accusion towards him. Also Antonio being the Protagonist of the play, being a merchant the name of the play is titled as Merchant of Venice due to the passive and overconfident traits which the merchant possess.

5 0
3 years ago
Why did the confederacy force food shortages as the Civil War progressed
Digiron [165]

C. There were not enough workers to cultivate and harvest crops.



6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Choose the correct direct speech. Jane told me that she had waited for her friend
Sladkaya [172]

Answer: c. Jane said to me, “ I waited for my friend.”

Explanation:

Direct speech is meant to report the things said by a person in the exact way that they said it.

One reason option A is wrong is that Jane said she had waited for the friend which made it past tense but in option A she was using a future continuous tense.

One reason option B is wrong is that it made it seem as though Jane was waiting for the speaker's friend not her own. For this same reason option D is wrong as well.

Option C is correct because it properly converts the indirect speech used by the speaker to direct speech.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which icon is not usually located in the quick launch area?
    12·2 answers
  • Read this passage from Frankenstein:
    6·2 answers
  • Which phrase best describes the connotation of the word “reigns”
    15·1 answer
  • What aspect of human nature is twain focusing on?
    11·2 answers
  • What is a key idea of the section titled “Video Games and Brain Changes"?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain why Caesar shouldn't die give examples from the text​
    12·1 answer
  • “Have some sympathy fuh me. Put me down easy, Janie, Ah’m a cracked plate.”
    9·1 answer
  • A scientist bred fruit flies in two separate containers with different food sources for many generations. When she put the fruit
    11·1 answer
  • It is recess and the sun is shining! Stefanie and Latisha can hardly keep from running as their class walks in a line to the pla
    12·1 answer
  • THE OUTSIDERS BY SE HINTON NO LINKS PLEASE
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!