Answer:
Answer for question 1: Re-enactors will never be able to completely replicate all of the situations and challenges of life in the past. Re-enactors, like historians, suffer limitations that cannot be ignored. A paucity of historical sources, for example, may mean that a recreated regiment can never be certain that its clothes are identical to those worn by troops serving in the regiment in the past. Furthermore, for the reasons of cleanliness and safety, certain characteristics cannot be replicated. Most re-enactment groups attempt to compensate for these inescapable modern effects (such as the use of modern toilets rather than digging a trench and food carried from home rather than scavenged in a nearby village) by striving for a realistic representation in every other manner.
Answer for question 2: In the absence of an audience, mainstream reenactors make an effort to appear real, yet they may fall out of character. Hidden stitches and undergarments may not be period-appropriate, but visible stitches are likely to be made in a period-correct manner. Food served in front of an audience is likely to be historically accurate, although it may not be seasonally or geographically appropriate. Modern things are occasionally utilized "after hours" or in a covert manner. The normal approach is to put on a nice show, but correctness is only required to the extent that others can see it.
Explanation:
Visitors to re-enactment activities obtain an understanding of a particular period. They gain an appreciation of how different life was in the past by simply asking questions, watching how food is prepared over a campfire, and looking at the tents that were used to sleep in. It's a true hands-on experience, since visitors are frequently allowed to sample food, touch uniforms to feel how heavy the cloth is, and learn about the steps involved in firing a musket. Through these contacts with the public, re-enactors pass on their expertise and perspective, making history very accessible. This is what distinguishes re-enactment from more traditional methods of teaching and learning history.
Answer:
A major difference between these men is the rational "from the ground on up" ethic of Franklin and the "one big plan" of the fictional Crane." In Irving's Rip Van Winkle, we find a much more giving character that is much less interested in the highlights of society than our other two characters
Explanation:
Because the time was going fast
When it comes to Pakistani women, they fall under the gender subordination system where they still face discrimination based on the gender.
<u>Explanation:</u>
They are the victims of domestic violence, child marriages, and forced marriages. Although there have been many steps taken to improve the conditions of women in Pakistan such as denouncing honour killings, involvement of lady traffic wardens to be in charge of traffic; still cases of domestic abuse and forced marriages remain.
Social activist like Malala Yousafzai is trying her hard to bring positive changes in the lives of Pakistani women. Now more and more girls are given an opportunity to pursue their education.
Answer:
Revenge Killing. The character is trying to avenge his father's death the murder was made a secret so a host could reveal it to the son.
Also Revenge killing hamlet prince of Denmark is a tragic hero and his novel was written by William Shakespeare during the period 1599 and 1601. The roots of it can be traced back to as far as the pre-thirteenth-century. The main character tries to avenge his father death and the tree witches always say the truth and predict the future if the Hamlet.
