Answer:
The correct answer is Crowdsourcing.
Explanation:
Crowdsourcing seeks to outsource or delegate tasks to be left in charge of a large group of people or community. This community, composed of qualified professionals will present their proposals, ideas and candidacies. Companies that use Crowdsourcing will choose the most suitable people to carry out the different jobs, solve the most complex problems and contribute to the development of the business through new and relevant ideas. The objective is to develop the tasks in a shorter period of time with more effective results thanks to more labor and the contribution of solutions. In this way, the effort by the customer, supplier or company is reduced. The elect or chosen within a community will be rewarded for their work in an economic, material or even labor way. Gedesco
Answer:
3. Correctly ignored a sunk cost
Explanation:
Sunk costs refer to those costs which have been incurred in the past, which are non recoverable and which have no current or future benefits.
Sunk costs are considered as irrelevant for decision making process as they do not relate to current period and have no future implications. For example, research and development expenditure incurred in the past represents a sunk cost.
In the given case, the ticket for opera was already purchased for $100 which can now neither be recovered nor transferred. Thus this cost is irrelevant for decision making as expenditure has already been made. When Shen decided to go for a party instead of the concert, Shen has correctly ignored a sunk cost.
<span>The attractiveness test asks the question: is the industry profitable or capable of being profitable. It is a fundamental test for managers and investors and helps to establish a baseline of performance expectation. An answer of 'no' to the attractiveness test indicates that the industry is not likely to be a good investment.</span>
I guess the correct answer is deviant workplace behavior.
Jonathan Cowan is upset because he was passed over for a promotion he had really worked hard for. In response to his anger toward the manager and the company, he has started gossiping about the manager with his colleagues and assigning blame on him unnecessarily. Jonathan's behavior is an example of deviant workplace behavior.
<u>Answer: </u>
Benefits are amplified at a point where the minor income efficiency (MRP) is equivalent to the expense of employing a security watch. In this way, a benefit expanding firm will enlist as long as the MRP is more noteworthy than the wages or the expense of recruiting a security monitor.
On the off chance that I need to amplify benefit, at that point I won't enlist the security monitor at a compensation pace of $20 in light of the fact that the expense of recruiting is more noteworthy than the expansion to the complete income or MRP, which is equivalent to $15 (expecting that the security watchman will kill shoplifting).
The above examination shows that a security watchman will be paid a compensation rate for every hour, which is equivalent to the sum spared every hour by the security monitor for wiping out the normal shoplifting every hour.
The sum spared is an expansion to the all out income, and no benefit boosting firm would pay a compensation rate higher than the augmentations to the complete income.
