The correct answer is <span>stock prices reflected the real value of companies.
Stocks didn't reflect the real value of the company because they had a much higher value than the company actually had. The companies weren't making profit yet were behaving as if everything was going smooth, so they started failing hard and by the time people realized they wouldn't get their money back, it was already too late.
The correct answer for 2 is </span><span>All of the above
Companies were failing because they couldn't make a profit so they couldn't pay banks back which meant that people would get fired. The high unemployment led to mass starvation since there were no jobs and no money to buy food. The banks lost all the money because they crashed when the companies started crashing.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Were either of these plans chosen by the delegation or was there a compromise to appease both sides?
No, these plans were not chosen at the Constitutional Convention of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1787. James Madison, a delegate from Virginia at the 1787 Constitutional Convention, recognized that one of the greatest flaws in the Articles of Confederation was its lack of a strong centralized government. In response to this flaw, Madison developed the “Virginia Plan.” However, no all the delegates agreed. That is when the Virginia Plan was countered by the New Jersey delegation, proposing the “New Jersey Plan.” The delegates had many discussions and debates to agree on the new form of government for the United States. Federalists supported a strong central government. Antifederalists supported a simpler government that promoted civil rights and liberties. That is when James Madison drafted the Bill of Rights, which is the first ten amendments to the US Constitution.
Warren Gamaliel Harding (November 2, 1865 – August 2, 1923) was the 29th president of the United States from 1921 until his death in 1923. A member of the Republican Party, he was one of the most popular U.S. presidents to that point. ... He is often rated as one of the worst presidents in historical rankings.
The Teapot Dome scandal was a bribery scandal involving the administration of United States President Warren G. Harding from 1921 to 1923. Harding administration passed the Emergency Tariff Act in the year 1921. ... The Emergency Tariff of 1921, increased rates on wheat, sugar, meat, wool and other agricultural products brought into the United States from foreign nations.
Most historians rank Harding as the worst of all American Presidents. Recently, some revisionists see him as an important transitional figure whose easy-going ways helped bridge the gap between Wilsonian idealism and the business prosperity of the Coolidge and Hoover years. Harding is also given some credit for his progressive views on race and civil rights.
Neither a deep thinker, nor a decisive President, Harding failed, in most opinions, to impact the nation simply because he saw the role of President as largely ceremonial. He saw himself as neither a caretaker nor as a leader. He just avoided issues whenever possible.
Unlike other modern Presidents, such as Ronald Reagan, who possessed conventional minds and who thought simply, Harding never understood where he wanted to take the nation. Nor could he communicate his message effectively, because he had none to communicate. He spoke about a "return to normalcy," but he had no idea what this slogan meant. Lacking the moral compass of a Reagan, Harding had no guide to follow. He was lucky to have had a few good men in his cabinet who generally ran fiscal and foreign affairs well.
In the end, it was not his corrupt friends that tarnished his legacy and undermined his historical impact. Rather, it was his own lack of vision and his poor sense of priorities that positioned him so low in the ranking of U.S. Presidents. Then, too, it was Harding's sad fate to have followed in office the most visionary of all our Presidents, Woodrow Wilson, the man whom historians generally rank among the top five or six Presidents in the nation's history.
The essay should be written to assess your ability to write and interpret information. For that reason, I can't write it for you, but I'll show you how to do it.
As shown in the above question, you must select a question and an answer on the US History exam resources page.
Next, you must evaluate and interpret the issue presented in the question and answer. This will be the subject of your essay and you should search for information about it.
In addition, you must form an opinion and a position on this subject. This will also be important for your research, as you must find information that supports your opinion on the subject.
After that, you can write your essay as follows:
- Introduction: Introduce the subject of your essay and show your interpretation, opinion and position in relation to this subject. This placement is your thesis statement.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. In the first paragraph, you should write the elements that make up the subject you are presenting and how these elements fit into society. In the second paragraph, you must show your arguments in relation to these elements, your interpretations and the impacts you recognize. Don't forget to prove your arguments with evidence drawn from your research sources.
- Conclusion: Summarize everything that was presented, restate the main subject of the essay, and reinforce your thesis statement.
You can get more information on writing an essay at the link below:
brainly.com/question/11606608?referrer=searchResults
