Answer:
Explanation:
Rate per period =15% = 15/12 monthly
Payment(PMT)=$1,000
Future amaount(FV)=$2,000,000
N(years)=?
If input this data into fin calculator, n= 262.27months=262.27/12years=21.86years
The answer is marginal costs in both places are the same. This
is because the farmers in both places are profit-maximizers, the value in each flat
is equal to MC or Marginal Cost and subsequently the market of corn is competitive,
the price of corn in both places is the same. Also, marginal costs are higher
in East Icicle than in Corncrib can also be a possible answer. For any given outflow
per acre Corncrib’s corn yield are far better than in East Icicle, at any level
of output, the marginal cost per acre in East Icicle must be higher in
Corncrib, which suggests that in equilibrium the output level of corn in East
Icicle is less than the output level of corn in Corncrib.
Arturo would incur an opportunity cost of 36 burritos if he increased his production of tacos by 27
<h3>How to find the opportunity cost</h3>
opportunity cost of Burritos
= 400 / 300
= 1.33
The opportunity cost of Tacos
300 / 400
= 0.75
For the tacos produced we would have
opportunity cost of tacos x opportunity cost that was incurred
= 36 * 0.75
= 27
Hence we would conclude by saying that Arturo would incur an opportunity cost of 36 burritos if he increased his production of tacos by 27
Read more on opportunity cost here: brainly.com/question/1549591
#SPJ1
complete question
The complete question for this particular question is in the attachment (picture)
Answer:<em> False</em>
Explanation:
The statement given in the question is false.
The correct statement is given as, "For risk episodes moderately within project horizon, resolution planning and strategies include working with clients to re-prioritize cost, itinerary, opportunity or quality and therefore precisely heightens problems."
