The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer would be, $70500
Explanation:
Raw Material Turnover means what amount of raw materials is used within a specific period of time. So the raw material turnover would be calculated by adding the beginning inventory with the amount of material used within the period, and then the remaining material will be deducted. So the whole calculations are shown as follows:
Beginning Raw Material Inventory: $5000
Raw Material Used: $71500
Ending Raw Material Inventory: $6000
Raw Material Inventory Turnover:
Beginning Inventory + Raw Material Used - Ending Raw Material
= 5000+71500-6000= $70500
Answer:
1. $550,000
Explanation:
1. It is given in the question that the stated interest rate and the market interest rate both are having the same rate, i.e, 12%.
Hence, the bonds are issued at the face value that is $550,000.
2. The Journal entries are as follows:
(i) On January 1,
Cash A/c Dr. $550,000
To bonds payable $550,000
(To record the bond issuance)
(ii) On December 31,
Interest Expense A/c Dr. $66,000
To cash A/c $66,000
(To record the first interest payment on December 31 assuming no interest has been accrued earlier in the year)
Workings:
Interest expense = $550,000 × 12%
= $66,000
Answer:
(g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Increase in price of typical soda = 10 cents
Total consumed = 150,000 sodas [er day
Dropped quantity = 75,000 sodas
So by considering the above information, the per day compensating variation of the tax varies from 0 and - 7,500
Since the sugar sweetened sodas is treated as a normal goods. Moreover, people can substitute the other goods also if there is an increase in a price of the good
The -7,500 is come from = (-75,000 × 0.10)
The options are as follows
(a) Greater than -$15k because soda is a luxury good with income (b) -$15k because that is the old consumption level times the value of the tax (c) Between -S7.5k and -$15k because soda is a luxury good elasticity > 1 with income elasticity >1 (d) Between -$7.5k arti -$15k because residents can substitute to other products (e) -$7.5k because that is the new consumption level times the value of the tax ()-$7.5k because that is the change in consumption times the value of the tax (g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products (h) Between 0 and -$7.5k because because beverages are typically necessity goods with 6) Nothing because there was no effect on income G) It is impossible to say without knowing consumers' marginal rate of substitution income elasticity less than 1
