Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
Answer: Hypothesis
Explanation:
Hypothesis is a proposed explanation made on the grounds of limited evidence at the initial stage until further and proper findings are carried out.
cause the bodies formed by the government by mentioning their function power and formation in the constitution. constitution plays a significant role in development of country.
this is actually like six but its cool right?
Develop fishery management plans.
Convene committees and advisory panels and conduct public meetings.
Develop research priorities.
Select fishery management options.
Set annual catch limits based on best available science.
Develop and implement rebuilding plans.
Are you looking for an appropriate word to name this?
I think that a good name is "propaganda", especially when the information is of political relevance.
In the past (and to some extend present) some totalitarian or non-democratic states used propaganda to shape public opinion.
