Answer: They wanted each other's land
Explanation: The conflict between ranchers and farmers basically comes down to either of the two not wanting each other on their land. Ranchers wanted to keep their often big amounts of land for grazing and driving cattle, and farmers wanted to settle down on the rancher's land and farm. People and animals moving west.
Answer:
D. worked long hours for low pay in factories.
Explanation:
Yes the us should force the freed blah blah blah Yes the us should force the freed blah blah blah Yes the us should force the freed blah blah blah
The most logical generalization is letter b. people in rural areas have smaller dating pool than people in urban areas.
<em>People in rural areas do not necessarily have an advantage with dating applications because everyone knows everyone, the number of people is much smaller, and they are people who naturally have a culture of approaching one to another.</em>
- <u>Itens a.</u> (dating applications do not often lead to romantic partnerships) <u>and d.</u> (most rural residents have located romantic partners through dating applications) > Both are distant from the contextualization of the passage.
- <u>Iten c.</u> (fewer rural residents than urban residents have smart phones) > It is not a generalization. It is another kind of conclusion. Not all conclusions are generalizations.
