Let the three numbers be x, y and z respectively, then
x + y + z = 62 . . . (1)
y = x - 4 . . . (2)
z = 4x . . . (3)
The above three expressions could be used to represent the numbers.
Solving the three equations, putting (2) and (3) into (1) gives
x + x - 4 + 4x = 62
6x - 4 = 62
6x = 62 + 4 = 66
x = 66/6 = 11
x = 11.
y = 11 - 4 = 7
z = 4(11) = 44
x = 11, y = 7, z = 44.
2 1/2 yds = 2.5 x 36 = 90 inches...what she started with
2 ft 8 in = 2(12) + 8 = 32 inches...what she had left
90 - x = 32
90 - 32 = x
x = 58 inches....so she used 58 inches
Answer:
This type of transformation is a horizontal stretch.
<em></em>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Required
Determine the type of transformation
The first function can be expressed as:
While the second function is:
Solving f(0.5x), we have to substitute 0.5x for x in
So:
The second function is:
<em>This type of transformation is a horizontal stretch.</em>
<em></em>
<em>i.e. f(x) stretched to g(x)</em>
Every whole number<span> is a </span>rational number: for example, 3=31. ... Everywhole number<span> n can be written as a fraction of integers: n=n1. We aren't required to write it that way; we just need to know that it is possible to express every </span>whole number<span> as a fraction of integers, and hence it is </span>rational<span>.
So I Believe the Correct Answer would Be D)</span><span> If a number is not a rational number, then it is not a whole number. The converse is true</span>
